Orange County NC Website
20 <br />1 Robert Nutter, Maple View Farm <br />2 Paul Rockwell, Orange Grove Community <br />3 Lori Schweickert, Teer Road Community <br />4 Llane Salgado, Transition Carrboro- Chapel Hill <br />5 Lorretta Smith, Efland Community <br />6 Maria Tadd, Ferguson Community <br />7 Susan Walser, Western Park Community <br />8 Chris Weaver, Caldwell Community <br />9 Dick and Norma White, Schley Community <br />10 Randall Williams, Mount Mitchell /Apple Mill Community <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />Chair Jacobs said he feels that the County's municipal partners have the expectation <br />that Orange County will not undermine the viability of the recycling program. <br />Commissioner McKee thanked the manager for including the option for residents to <br />continue use of the current recycling bins. He also thanked him for the inclusion of the <br />evaluation at the beginning of 2015, in the event that the Board goes with the manager's <br />recommendation. He feels this evaluation would give the Board the option to re- direct and go <br />with the tax district. <br />He said the opt -out was a critical issue for him; and he is convinced that some people <br />will opt out, but he does not believe it will be 20 percent. He feels that when new customers are <br />figured in, the loss will be less than 20 percent. He said he has spoken with people who have <br />curbside recycling in his area and these residents like it and don't want to lose it. He does not <br />believe these people will opt out. He is aware of several communities that also want to opt in as <br />a viable route. <br />Commissioner McKee said he likes this option and the above mentioned provisions. He <br />does not know how to address the possible disparity questions from the town. He said the only <br />argument he could make against the tax district is that some properties will be paying for a <br />service they cannot get. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if the 20 percent estimate is based only on the parcels <br />already in the service area. <br />Michael Talbert said that is correct. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if there is a sense of how many of these residents were <br />already not participating in the service. <br />Michael Talbert said this information can be gotten from the RFID chips on the newer <br />containers. He said, from the visual perspective of the drivers, about 60 -65 percent set out <br />recycling containers on any given 2 week schedule. He said this may mean that people only <br />use the service once a month or it may mean that only 65 percent are using it, though he does <br />not think this is the case. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said the premise of the "opt out" option is that people, who may <br />recycle when it is part of their taxes, won't participate if it is a separate bill. He is trying to <br />understand this. He said this seems odd, since he feels people recycle because they are <br />philosophically committed to it, or they are not. He does not feel that he has enough <br />information about the impacts of any of these options. <br />Commissioner Rich said she feels the same way about not having enough information <br />to make a decision. She said the raising of the fee may cause people to opt out, and the idea <br />of the subscription service does not sit well with her. She feels the County should have a <br />program that everyone could use, and she is not in favor of this. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she is concerned about the subscription service. She said <br />one concern is that the best case scenario would be that 20% would opt out. She said this <br />