Orange County NC Website
I Commissioner Gordon said she feels that the insurance provision is reasonable, and the <br />2 Board should approve the resolution as it stands. <br />3 Michael Talbert said this is also the manager's recommendation. <br />4 Commissioner Gordon noted that there is a mis- numbered provision, and she asked for <br />5 a clarification on this. <br />6 John Roberts said there is a numbering error on the abstract; however this has already <br />7 been corrected on the proposed executed document. <br />8 Commissioner McKee asked if the landowner has provided a desired figure for <br />9 insurance. <br />10 John Roberts said he is not aware of any figure that has been provided. <br />11 Commissioner Dorosin asked for an explanation of why this insurance is necessary. <br />12 John Roberts said the insurance provides liability against any negligent activity on the <br />13 property that result in damage to someone who then decides to sue the County. He said N.C. <br />14 has no case law on liability to a conservation easement holder. He said other states do have <br />15 this. He said there have been liability cases where a third party was injured due to a lack of <br />16 monitoring on the conservation restrictions. He said this is why he recommends that there be <br />17 liability insurance in the easement requirements. <br />18 Commissioner Dorosin asked for more clarification on this. He proposed the example of <br />19 a resident trespassing on the easement and being killed by a falling tree. <br />20 John Roberts gave the example of a resident drowning on the easement because of an <br />21 unnatural object that shouldn't be there, such as a tire swing or some other object that is man - <br />22 made. He said the easement is supposed to be a wild conservation easement that is <br />23 maintained in its natural state. <br />24 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the easement is accessible to the public. <br />25 John Roberts said only the landowner and his guests may be on the easement. <br />26 Commissioner Pelissier said she is confused about this insurance for the easement <br />27 versus any insurance the property already owns on the land. <br />28 John Roberts said the land is not developed, so he does now know what insurance the <br />29 owner would have. <br />30 Commissioner Pelissier asked if this is not part of the landowner's property. <br />31 John Roberts said the only dwelling on it is a mobile home. <br />32 <br />33 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin to <br />34 approve the Manager's recommendation for the Board to adopt and authorize the Chair to sign <br />35 the resolution approving the acceptance by Orange County of the conservation easement and <br />36 authorize the Chair and the Clerk to sign the conservation easement agreement, subject to final <br />37 review by staff and County Attorney, with a closing and recordation of the document expected <br />38 to occur on or about December 31, 2013. <br />39 <br />40 Commissioner Rich asked what would happen if the landowner does not agree. She <br />41 asked if the easement would be lost. <br />42 John Roberts said that is what would happen. <br />43 Michael Talbert said this is under a time constraint of December 31, 2013. <br />44 Commissioner Price asked for clarifications on what the land owners would agree to <br />45 pay. <br />46 Rich Shaw said he has spoken with the owners, but there has not been an opportunity <br />47 to negotiate a price. He said the owners have objected to this particular provision, as they <br />48 believe the specified amount is too high. The owners also feel it is a burden to have the County <br />49 as a third party. <br />50 Commissioner Price asked if this has been an issue with other easements. <br />