Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-13-2014 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 02-13-2014 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-13-2014 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2014 3:58:41 PM
Creation date
2/7/2014 3:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/13/2014
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> Follow Up to November 12,2013 Space Study Attachment B <br /> Executive Summary <br /> At the request of the BOOCduringthe November 12, 2013 work session,Asset Management Services("AMS') <br /> staff: <br /> • Fbviewed options for use of unused and under-utilized space in several County buildings, including the <br /> financially stressed Environment and Agriculture Center(EAC); <br /> • Identified options for future use of the spaces, and <br /> • Developed cost est imates for the work necessary to prepare spaces for use. <br /> Each space has a number of options for future use,with varying associated costs for each. <br /> AMSalso developed more specific recommendations and options for the Board's review concerning storage <br /> space utilization. <br /> RressedAsset/Under=Utilized Space. <br /> The EACon Fbvere Fbad was identified as stressed asset by ECS Carol inas in the evaluation previously <br /> performed for the County. If thisfacility isto remain in use beyond the next four to five years, significant <br /> improvementswill be required, estimated at $1,433,000(Plus upfit costs if layout isto be modified -see table <br /> below). <br /> Another facility where significant investmentswould be required for occupancy by staff is the former Cedar <br /> Grove school/future Cedar Grove community center, if classroom wings were to be occupied. Should the <br /> Board decide to retain these wings, basiccostswill be incurred for any future use, in order to meet building <br /> and fire code requirements. However, additional investment would be necessary if staff were to be relocated <br /> to the facility, due to current Iimitson the septicsystem. <br /> Underutilized but very"healthy' space existsat the Government Service Annex, currently used to house <br /> elections equipment. This space could be upfit for use as offices rather than storage, as is currently the case <br /> for much of the building. Storage is not the highest and best use of this fad lity; it would serve much better as <br /> an office building, and could support office and collaborative uses in its current state. Investment will be <br /> required beyond the next four to five yearsto replace the existing WACsystem, and to address issues <br /> associated with the building being partially within the flood plain, if it isto remain in use. <br /> Smilarly, other underutilized but healthy spaces exist at the Whitted Center(approximately 2,565 assignable <br /> square feet)and Link Center(approximately 4,680 assignable square feet). Both would require basic <br /> renovations to create office and/or multi-functional space. <br /> The tables below provide an overview of options for the Board to consider regarding potential uses of these <br /> facilities(equipment and/or staff)and associated cost estimatesfor each. The Board may choose to: <br /> 1) Continue to maintain t he exist i ng fad I it i es and uses"as is" and commit the resources to maintaining <br /> them, even in an inefficient manner; or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.