Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-11-2014 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 02-11-2014 - Budget Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-11-2014 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 10:17:43 AM
Creation date
2/7/2014 3:33:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/11/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-11-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County NC 11 <br /> Radio Communication Tower and System Infrastructure Upgrade <br /> RF Coverage and Sites/Towers <br /> 2.1.5 Southeast-Alternate to WCHL Site <br /> An alternate to the WCHL site may be a parcel of land about 1,000 ft. to the south of the <br /> WCHL property — Figure 1 shows an aerial view of this site. FE identified this as part of <br /> the Eastgate Shopping Center parcel, PIN # 9799255527. <br /> This property is in a flood plain, in an area labeled as Jordan Lake (unprotected). This <br /> may require the use of raised platforms for the site equipment (shelter, generator, and <br /> fuel tanks) <br /> Also, due to the proximity to the WCHL-AM towers, any new tower may require "AM — <br /> de-tuning". <br /> A tower elevation and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Report is in preparation <br /> for submission under separate cover. <br /> FE reviewed the 800 MHz RF coverage differences between the WCHL site and the <br /> alternate site. Our analysis used the same antenna height as was used for the WCHL <br /> site. While the coverage obtained from the alternate site is slightly different from the <br /> WCHL site, the differences are not significant, and the alternate site provides the <br /> required RF coverage to the immediate area. <br /> Figure 11 in Section 2.1.7 shows the RF coverage for the WCHL site, and Figure 12 <br /> shows the RF coverage from the alternate site. <br /> August 30, 2013 Page 10 of 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.