Orange County NC Website
r <br /> 75 <br /> Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br /> CHAPTER 8- Economic, Health and Environmental Impacts of Parks and Recreation <br /> With the clear connections between public health Future Opportunities for Parks and Public Health <br /> and parks and recreation, it will be important that These considerations, and the preceding discussion <br /> Orange County includes key public health considera- emphasize that access to and use of parks and recre- <br /> tions in design of parks and recreation programs, ation facilities are an integral part of an active, <br /> policies, or projects. A number of national and state healthy community. Communities that support ac- <br /> documents provide guidance on these considera- tive living through parks and recreation, accessible <br /> tions, and outline recommended strategies and goals transportation, bike and pedestrian infrastructure <br /> 26 Z'to increase active living in communities. <br /> improvements could prevent up to 1.7 pounds of <br /> Some of the considerations mentioned in these weight gain per year, lower risk of obesity by 35%, <br /> documents include: and increase life expectancy by 4 years.28 However, <br /> 1. Proximity of recreation facilities to homes, the goal of such an active, healthy community and its <br /> schools,or other frequented areas benefits cannot be attained without collaboration <br /> 2. Accessibility of recreation facilities to public from diverse community, government, and business <br /> transportation partners. Only when these partners all recognize and <br /> 3. Cost of recreational facility use strive towards active living as an integrated way of <br /> 4. Safety,or perceived safety,of recreational life, and not simply an individual choice to be made <br /> facilities each day, will we achieve the health, economic, and <br /> 5. Hours of operation of recreational facilities <br /> 6. Safe pedestrian/bike facilities connecting parks other benefits we desire. <br /> and recreation facilities <br /> Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration <br /> Similar conversations are occurring in parks and rec- <br /> reation, public health, and planning communities. In _ <br /> November 2012, an article on trends in parks and _ vy <br /> public health further noted the following: <br /> I!i <br /> Indeed, leaders from both the public health and park and <br /> recreation fields make compelling arguments that custodi- <br /> ons of our green spaces, trails and greenways, recreation <br /> facilities, community centers, and playgrounds hold the <br /> keys to our most widely accessible dispensary of national L <br /> health solutions: <br /> Doctors really ought to prescribe parks and public recrea- <br /> tion programs to their patients most at risk for obesity- <br /> related illnesses. <br /> • Communities should seek to identify and address 4 <br /> "recreation deserts"and connect residents with un- <br /> der-utilized recreational spaces through bike and i <br /> walking trails. <br /> • Community-led studies of public health consequenc- <br /> es should inform and guide changes to the built envi- <br /> ronment—and parks should play key roles. <br /> • Organizations chartered to fight chronic diseases <br /> should partner with the caretakers of local walking . <br /> trails and greenways. <br /> 1 <br /> • And, we should all agree to keep parks tobacco free. <br /> 8-9 <br />