Orange County NC Website
52 <br /> Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br /> CHAPTER 6-Community Needs Assessment and Public Input 6 <br /> In looking at the sum total of all surveys received in A strong majority of the cumulative respondents like <br /> Table 1, one of the most striking things about the the quality of existing facilities, agree that more ac- <br /> responses is that the respondents in the SRS, online tive and low-impact facilities are needed, and <br /> and targeted surveys are all fairly similar in their believe in an expanded trail system linking various <br /> view of County facilities, programs and value. This is areas of the county. Support for indoor facilities for <br /> particularly noteworthy as the online survey is a arts and leisure and athletics is not as strong, but <br /> younger, more Hillsborough and rural Orange still a majority. Respondents gave very high marks <br /> County located cohort., whereas the SRS survey has for safety, maintenance, access and friendliness of <br /> a high response from urban southern Orange Coun- staff (94% Agree/Strongly Agree). The vast majority <br /> ty, and is older in general. The SRS survey answers of all respondents believe that parks and recreation <br /> to each question range around 5-7percentage points programs enhance the economic health of the coun- <br /> higher in the agree/strongly agree category than the ty, enhance physical and mental well-being and (to <br /> online survey. (Please see Appendix 7-3 and 7-4 to slightly lesser degree) reduce crime. <br /> compare the two survey results). The number of C. Recreation Activity Participation <br /> "Don't Know" responses is listed in the final column, In this case, over half (58%) of respondents identi- <br /> and in parentheses the number of those that came fied athletic leagues or programs they had <br /> from the SRS survey is shown. As can be seen, in participated in during the previous year. Most of <br /> many cases the vast majority of persons answering <br /> „ these were respondents to the online survey. Con- <br /> Don t Know were in the SRS survey, which further siderably fewer persons in the SRS survey had expe- <br /> validates the previous note about respondents in <br /> rience participating in a County recreation program <br /> these areas being less familiar with County facilities in the ear.ast The most <br /> and programs since they include a majority of p y popular programs by <br /> participation in the past 12 months were: <br /> respondents from the towns of Chapel Hill and <br /> Carrboro. 1. Youth Soccer(35%) <br /> In summary, the combined survey results shown 2. Youth Basketball (30%) <br /> here track with most of the "Agree/Disagree" 3. Open Gym (9%) <br /> aggregate response rates from the other individual <br /> 4. Little River Trail Run (6%) <br /> surveys. Online survey participants were somewhat 5. Volleyball(5%) <br /> more interested in expanding active outdoor Most popular instructional programs in the online <br /> recreation opportunities and were also slightly less survey were Start Smart Soccer, Zumba, Tennis <br /> certain about a trail system linking various areas of (both adult and youth), Golf (youth and adult) and <br /> the county. However, the rate of"Agree" responses Creative Arts. The full list and breakdown of partici- <br /> stayed fairly consistent between the surveys. pants may be found in Appendix 6-6. <br /> The most popular environmental programs were the <br /> County's Earth Day event (34%), followed by Under <br /> the Stars (17%) and Tiny Trekkers (17%) programs at <br /> t Little River Regional Park and Natural Area.The Little <br /> River Park Bird Counts also received 11% of the <br /> _ r votes. In response to the question "How often do <br /> '+ you or members of your household travel outside of <br /> _ Orange County to participate in recreation pro- <br /> grams," 471 respondents (62.4%) indicated they <br /> never traveled outside of the county for programs. <br /> 6-6 <br />