Orange County NC Website
108 <br /> Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br /> CHAPTER 11-Issues for Further Study/Conclusion 11 <br /> for new facilities that are related directly to the in- <br /> Example: <br /> crease in persons and park needs generated by the Land Dedication <br /> development. 10 lots: 10 x 1/57 of an acre (0.018 acre) = 0.18 acre of <br /> The full language of the parks and open space land land dedicated for parks/open space. it <br /> dedication / payment-in-lieu system is provided as Payment in Lieu of Land Dedication <br /> Appendix 11-1. While this system has provided 10 lots: 10 x$455=$4,550 payment in lieu <br /> important auxiliary funding to the acquisition of As can be seen in the example above, land <br /> several park sites and the construction of a parks, dedication rates for a typical subdivision would <br /> one of the drawbacks of the system is that the land generate small fractions of an acre in land for a park, <br /> dedication and funding provisions remain the same amounts far too small to be useful for park needs by <br /> as they were in the 1980s. Developers of a subdivi- a county that focuses on district and community- <br /> sion must provide 1/57 of an acre for each dwelling scale parks. Even a 100-lot subdivision would <br /> unit in the subdivision plan (1/20 of an acre in areas generate by this formula only 1.8 acres of parks and <br /> of floodplains and steep slopes). However, a subdivi- open space land (or up to 5 acres if all were flood- <br /> sion developer may, with approval, make a payment plain or steep slope land). Largely for this reason <br /> in lieu of land dedication if there are no identified (and the fact that few developments have occurred <br /> park needs on this location. In this case, the at planned park sites), the County has chosen to <br /> developer may make a payment equal for $422 per accept the payment-in-lieu amount rather than try <br /> lot if within an identified community park service to administer hundreds of tiny park sites. By local <br /> area (smaller portions of the county around com- legislation and ordinance, payment-in-lieu funds <br /> munity park sites),or$455 per lot if within a district must be expended in the district in which the sub- <br /> park service area (all of the county). division is located. <br /> Map 11-1:Current(2014) Payment-in-Lieu Districts While the payment in lieu funds have been an im- <br /> portant, albeit small contributor to parkland acquisi- <br /> tion and park construction, the need for a more up- <br /> to-date approach to land dedication and payment in <br /> lieu has long been needed. Attempts to examine <br /> ' . Northeast Dhtdd Pork <br /> - i <br /> changes to this model were explored by 1999 or <br /> f before, and an analysis was undertaken by a con- <br /> _ ' sultant firm in 2001. <br /> CheekWillshoraxgh District Park ' <br /> ae� , At that time, the consultant's finding determined <br /> _j that the County's program for land dedication / <br /> ' 1 payment-in-lieu provided insufficient support, but <br /> noted that the County's lack of existing parks creat- <br /> ed a level of service that may not warrant an in- <br /> crease. Knowing that the County was preparing to <br /> embark on its first attempt to build parks and create <br /> s- <br /> mm <br /> r <br /> arks system, it was recommended that this s <br /> Chape!!fl!/Tmvash/p`Distrkv Park a., parks y <br /> tem be re-evaluated in several years when new <br /> ('arr6sro <br /> j parks were opened and the level of service <br /> increased. <br /> 11-2 <br />