Orange County NC Website
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner McKee to defer <br /> approval of a new County logo, and refer the matter to the logo design committee for a recommendation <br /> concerning a new logo design, and she indicated her willingness to participate. <br /> Commissioner Price asked how much more this would cost the County. <br /> Carla Banks said this would cost more money. She said it was initially anticipated that this process <br /> would not exceed $2200. She said the additional dollar amount will depend on the complexity of the <br /> design being requested. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said there were many different opinions expressed about the logos during <br /> the work session. She said she is ready to vote, and she feels like people will still have different opinions <br /> if this goes back. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said, of the four options, he likes option D. He said if one of these options <br /> is not chosen, he would suggest opening it up to the community for ideas. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he hasn't been any more impressed with the other Counties' logos. He <br /> said he seconded the motion for the purpose of discussion, but he feels it is time to choose one of the <br /> logos and move forward. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she agrees that a consensus is unlikely, and she likes option A without the <br /> line and option D with no line. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if Commissioner Gordon would accept an amendment to her motion, <br /> to make this a community project in Orange County. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he liked option A with no line, and he did not support Commissioner Gordon's <br /> motion to take it back to committee. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said no to the friendly amendment, as that would take a long time. <br /> VOTE: Ayes, 1 (Commissioner Gordon); Nays, 6 <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to choose <br /> option A for the redesigned logo for the County The new logo design would go into effect on July 1, 2014, <br /> allowing for the current logo to be phased out. <br /> Commissioner Price asked why this will not go into effect until July. <br /> Carla said the current logo is in circulation on phone books, as well as other materials. <br /> VOTE: Ayes, 6; Nays, 1 (Commissioner Dorosin) <br /> 8. Reports <br /> a. Solid Waste Convenience Center Update <br /> The Board received information regarding performance of the new Walnut Grove Church Road <br /> Convenience Center and progress of planning for Eubanks Road Convenience Center improvements. <br /> Gayle Wilson said residents appear to be adjusting to the upgraded facility, and operations are <br /> working better than expected. <br /> He said there is a need for another stationary compactor; however, in the interim two compactor <br /> boxes are being delivered to alleviate the waste storage problem. <br /> He said canopies have been ordered to shelter employees from inclement weather. <br /> Gayle Wilson referred to several PowerPoint slides with photographs of the Walnut Grove facility <br /> and a draft plan for the Eubanks Road facility. <br /> He said the town's planning department had requested additional informational items for the <br /> Eubanks Road facility, and this is being provided. He walked through the draft plan map. He said this <br /> facility layout will be very similar to Walnut Grove, except for the single entrance and exit. He said staff is <br /> proposing three MSW compactors and two bulky waste compactors. <br /> He said staff is also proposing incorporation of the hazardous waste facility into the Eubanks Road <br /> facility. He said this will allow expanded hours for hazardous waste disposal. <br />