Orange County NC Website
expedited process for accessory agricultural uses and whether this was appropriate in the rural <br /> buffer. He said some of the discussion was about making sure the planning board and the <br /> agricultural board had an opportunity to weigh in on these ordinances. He said he subsequently <br /> received an email from the planning department, which everyone has looked at. <br /> Chair Jacobs asked if there was any information that the Planning Board wished to <br /> communicate to the towns. He noted some of the concerns about depleting water or sewer. He <br /> said there are several things that needed more explanation, and he suggested this might be <br /> covered at the quarterly public hearing in February. <br /> He said another issue is the Eno Economic Development District (EDD). He said the <br /> Board of County Commissioners just passed a resolution that addressed the concerns people <br /> felt about N.C. Highway 10. He said the Board plans to send a letter to the petitioners who <br /> oppose the EDD, explaining that the concerns about Old NC 10 are being addressed. <br /> Chair Jacobs said rural clustering was discussed at the retreat last year. He said it is <br /> difficult to achieve any kind of density in rural Orange County, whether it is in the rural buffer or <br /> not. He said discussions centered on ways to have density where there are activity nodes. He <br /> said there is no mechanism for considering alternative systems other than water and sewer or <br /> well and septic tanks. He said Orange County has been resistant to putting any type of <br /> treatment plant anywhere. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he hopes to have a conversation about affordable housing in the <br /> mixed use and economic development districts. He said this is an area where some affordable <br /> units could be negotiated. <br /> Chair Jacobs opened the floor for additional comments. <br /> Commissioner Rich said there was a robust conversation at the AOG meeting regarding <br /> what goes on in the rural buffer areas, so clearly this is a topic of concern. She is glad the <br /> County is engaging Chapel Hill and Carrboro <br /> Maxecine Mitchell arrived at 5:52 pm. <br /> Paul Guthrie said he spent much of his career managing state agency funding of water <br /> and sewer projects in the early days of the clean water act. He said one of the biggest <br /> problems occurred in a county that had a high number of septic tanks, many of which were not <br /> in operation. He said the challenge was figuring out how to retrofit that county for some sort of <br /> sewage and water supply. He said Orange County is not to that level of density, but this needs <br /> to be considered as the density and population increases. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the land use plan that was adopted in 1981 pretty much defines <br /> where water and sewer will go, and the County has done a good job of identifying these areas. <br /> He said this does not mean that you cannot have a rural village. He noted the high amount of <br /> protected watershed in the majority of the County, which is problematic for water and sewer. <br /> Craig Benedict said the 2040 plan from the Metropolitan Transportation MPO projects <br /> more than 63,000 people moving into rural Orange County over a 30 year period. He said this <br /> equates to 930 houses per year. He said this is a challenge and these projections need to be <br /> examined. He said there is high demand due to the job growth in the Triangle. He said if the <br /> models say these people are coming then the land use regulations need to be in line with that. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he feels that the numbers from the MPO are drastically over- <br /> estimated. He does not want to plan for growth that won't actually happen and is not wanted. <br /> He said there will always be unanticipated situations that happen, such as droughts or <br /> recessions, that change the planner's trajectories. He said it is good to look at the numbers, but <br /> it is necessary to vet the projections before planning for them. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said she does not want the land use plan driven solely by <br /> compilation projections that go out 30-50 years. She said it does not make sense to just look at <br /> rural Orange County. She said there should be consideration of all municipalities and what they <br /> 2 <br />