Minutes 11-19-2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Dorosin said the recommended language in attachment 7 talks generally about additional review of N.C. 10 and Highway 70. Chair Jacobs pointed out the language in the last part of the resolution on page 64. Commissioner Dorosin referred to the map that shows the zonings, and overlay districts in yellow. Abigaile Pittman said this marks the major transportation corridor on the interstate. Commissioner Dorosin asked how the boundaries of this corridor were created. He noted that it does not follow lot lines, and it seems much wider in some areas than others. Abigaile Pittman said this is because this is an intersection of two major corridors- Highway 70 and the interstate. She said the distances are defined by the ordinance. Commissioner Dorosin said this zoning map is on page 19 — 5-c-2. Chair Jacobs said he shared Commissioner Price's concerns about the residents. PUBLIC COMMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner McKee to close the public hearing. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner McKee to approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Resolution (Attachment 7) adopting the Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Access Management Plan (detailed in Attachment 2), which incorporates the Plan revisions recommended by staff and included in the Planning Board's and OUTBoard's recommendations of approval; and authorize Chair Jacobs to send a letter to the residents of N.C. 10. VOTE: UNANIMOUS 6. Consent Agenda • Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda - 6-f - 6-h • Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to approve the remaining items on the consent agenda. VOTE: UNANIMOUS • Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda 6-f- Commemorative Plaques for Recently Commissioned Facilities The Board considered approving the installation of commemorative plaques in recently constructed facilities, with funding of up to $22,500 from currently available funds within the Asset Management Services General Fund FY 2013-14 budget to cover the costs.