Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br /> 1 Commissioner Gordon said she has looked at these designs, and she appreciates the work of the <br /> 2 committee, staff and Commissioners; however she still thinks they can do better than these four options, <br /> 3 and she would be glad to work on this with staff. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner McKee to defer <br /> 6 approval of a new County logo, and refer the matter to the logo design committee for a recommendation <br /> 7 concerning a new logo design, and she indicated her willingness to participate. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commissioner Price asked how much more this would cost the County. <br /> 10 Carla Banks said this would cost more money. She said it was initially anticipated that this process <br /> 11 would not exceed $2200. She said the additional dollar amount will depend on the complexity of the design <br /> 12 being requested. <br /> 13 Commissioner Pelissier said there were many different opinions expressed about the logos during <br /> 14 the work session. She said she is ready to vote, and she feels like people will still have different opinions if <br /> 15 this goes back. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin said, of the four options, he likes option D. He said if one of these options is <br /> 17 not chosen, he would suggest opening it up to the community for ideas. <br /> 18 Commissioner McKee said he hasn't been any more impressed with the other Counties' logos. He <br /> 19 said he seconded the motion for the purpose of discussion, but he feels it is time to choose one of the <br /> 20 logos and move forward. <br /> 21 Commissioner Rich said she agrees that a consensus is unlikely, and she likes option A without the <br /> 22 line and option D with no line. <br /> 23 Commissioner Dorosin asked if Commissioner Gordon would accept an amendment to her motion, <br /> 24 to make this a community project in Orange County. <br /> 25 Chair Jacobs said he liked option A with no line, and he did not support Commissioner Gordon's <br /> 26 motion to take it back to committee. <br /> 27 Commissioner Gordon said no to the friendly amendment, as that would take a long time. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 VOTE: Ayes, 1 (Commissioner Gordon); Nays, 6 <br /> 30 <br /> 31 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to choose <br /> 32 option A for the redesigned logo for the County The new logo design would go into effect on July 1, 2014, <br /> 33 allowing for the current logo to be phased out. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Commissioner Price asked why this will not go into effect until July. <br /> 36 Carla said the current logo is in circulation on phone books, as well as other materials. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 VOTE: Ayes, 6; Nays, 1 (Commissioner Dorosin) <br /> 39 <br /> 40 8. Reports <br /> 41 <br /> 42 a. Solid Waste Convenience Center Update <br /> 43 The Board received information regarding performance of the new Walnut Grove Church Road <br /> 44 Convenience Center and progress of planning for Eubanks Road Convenience Center improvements. <br /> 45 Gayle Wilson said residents appear to be adjusting to the upgraded facility, and operations are <br /> 46 working better than expected. <br /> 47 He said there is a need for another stationary compactor; however, in the interim two compactor <br /> 48 boxes are being delivered to alleviate the waste storage problem. <br /> 49 He said canopies have been ordered to shelter employees from inclement weather. <br /> 50 Gayle Wilson referred to several PowerPoint slides with photographs of the Walnut Grove facility <br /> 51 and a draft plan for the Eubanks Road facility. <br /> 52 He said the town's planning department had requested additional informational items for the <br /> 53 Eubanks Road facility, and this is being provided. He walked through the draft plan map. He said this <br />