Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 1 86 parcels, none of that falls within the boundaries of the Town of Chapel Hill or the ETJ. He <br /> 2 said the smaller district does not allow Chapel Hill's participation in funding. <br /> 3 Commissioner Dorosin said the task force has been meeting for two years and has <br /> 4 considered all of these options, including the district. He said the task force came forward with <br /> 5 recommendations, and the priority is to get water and sewer to these 86 parcels. He said this <br /> 6 could be moved forward expeditiously, and the district could come later. <br /> 7 He said there is a plan in place to get this process moving. He said Carrboro has <br /> 8 committed its share of funding, and Hillsborough could put funding in with the ETJ. He said the <br /> 9 County needs to make clear its commitment to putting in funding. He said his understanding <br /> 10 was that the $3.7 million plan assumed that Chapel Hill would not be able to put in any money. <br /> 11 Commissioner Dorosin said he feel it is a disastrous idea to sit back and wait for the <br /> 12 resolution of the EPA complaint. He believes the majority of the Commissioners are committed <br /> 13 to recommendation #2. He feels this should be explained to the EPA, and this could possibly <br /> 14 resolve the complaint and allow them to move forward. He said the EPA could take months, <br /> 15 and this would cause momentum to be lost. He said this is an opportunity to do what is right for <br /> 16 the County. He would like to move forward with recommendation #2. <br /> 17 Mayor Chilton said he agrees with Commissioner Dorosin, and he feels the <br /> 18 municipalities should come together collectively and approach the EPA to communicate that the <br /> 19 complaint has been resolved. He said it feels disingenuous to hold this up while waiting on the <br /> 20 results of the EPA or another study. He feels it is time to adopt the recommendations and go <br /> 21 forward. <br /> 22 Alderman Seils referred to an email from the County attorney to the town attorney <br /> 23 regarding the direction that no funding should be committed until RENA provides assurance <br /> 24 that their complaint has been withdrawn or that the EPA has dismissed the complaint. He then <br /> 25 read from a letter addressed to the County attorney from RENA, stating that RENA would <br /> 26 voluntarily dismiss the EPA complaint in exchange for the County's written agreement to fully <br /> 27 fund sewer infrastructure in Rogers Road. He said this seems like a way out, and the solution <br /> 28 is right in front of them. <br /> 29 Commissioner Price said once the sewer lines are in, there is cost associated with the <br /> 30 hook ups. She said this is expensive, and most of these residents cannot afford it. She said <br /> 31 the extension of the ETJ would allow for the application for community development block grant <br /> 32 (CDBG) funds to help residents hook up. She asked if it is almost certain that Chapel Hill <br /> 33 would agree to the ETJ. <br /> 34 Mayor Kleinschmidt said the Town asked for more information about a water and sewer <br /> 35 district instead of extending the ETJ. He said even if the ETJ is extended, this area is still not in <br /> 36 Chapel Hill. He said despite the fact that some CDBG funds have gone up nationally, Chapel <br /> 37 Hill gets less CDBG funding because HUD has changed their formula. He would like to avoid <br /> 38 removing another recipient of the CDBG funding in order to move money to the Rogers Road <br /> 39 area. <br /> 40 Commissioner Price said that topic only came up for discussion. <br /> 41 Mayor Kleinschmidt said there has been a 50-60 percent decrease in CDBG money in <br /> 42 the past decade, so he hopes this is not a solution in anyone's mind. <br /> 43 Council Member Greene said she thought that Chapel Hill could only contribute money <br /> 44 to water and sewer if Rogers Road was in the ETJ. She asked if this is different than doing a <br /> 45 district. <br /> 46 Council Member Storrow said the logic was that the larger utility district would <br /> 47 encompass a portion of the County that included Chapel Hill and would allow the Town's <br /> 48 participation. He said the smaller district that includes only Historic Rogers Road does not <br /> 49 include any portion that is part of Chapel Hill. <br /> 50 Council Member Greene asked if an ETJ is needed or not. <br />