Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6i - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTACHMENT 4 29 "approved" in the following sentence: "The municipalities and the countieswill participate in funding the portion of the costs of the MPO's work program not covered by federal or state funding as approved by the M PO Board." The remainder of 9action II, on page 9-10, No change. The MOU is not the appropriate attempts to deal with the recently established mechanism to address these concerns. Oversight requirement that local governments provide a mechanisms have been addressed in the portion of the local match required to support document entitled "FY2014 Unified Planning Work MPOstaff activities.While the local governments Program (UPWP) LPAOversight Structuresand and M PO have agreed to establish an oversight Highlights"that was approved as part of the UPWP committee that will develop the annual work at the May 2013 TACmeeting. program and related annual budget Chapel Hill believes the MOU does not addressthe issue of potential disagreements between the member jurisdictions and the M PO staff over the budget and related local payments.This section needs some improvement. Town of Carrboro Comments-Received 9/13/13 Comment TAC Response Page 6-7, line 36-4. The minimum number of Change made. The number of weighted votesfor weighted votesfor all parties should be two(2), each local government was doubled. Triangle except for the N.C. Board of Transportation and Transit and N.0 Board of Transportation each Triangle Transit,who should receive one(1)vote, have one vote. to reflect the fact that they are distinct from the other parties in that they are represented by appointed, and not elected,officials. Page 9, line 36. Language should be added No change. The MOU is not the appropriate establishing an oversight process for activities mechanism to address this concern. Oversight conducted under the MPO's work plan, as has mechanisms have been addressed in the been agreed to by M PO staff and member document entitled "FY2014 Unified Planning Work jurisdiction staff. Program (UPWP) LPAOversight Structuresand Highlights"that was approved as part of the UPWP at the May 2013 TACmeeting. Page 9, line 26. A limitation on the percent annual No change. The M PO Board has the authority to increase in the UPWP budget should be added. control the level of spending in the UPWP. Page 10, line26. Thewritten notice period for Change made. termination of participation in the transportation planning process should be changed from thirty (30)days to ninety(90)days. City of Durham Comments-Received on 9/16113 Comment TAC Response Page 10, line26. Thewritten notice period for Change made. 4