Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
1/24/2014 2:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-23-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said, considering on how much focus they put on process, he <br /> 2 does not understand why process was not put in this item. <br /> 3 Chair Jacobs clarified that the plaque described is designed for interior use. <br /> 4 Jeff Thompson said the exterior ones are 4 to 5 times more expensive and are more <br /> 5 difficult to install. <br /> 6 Commissioner Dorosin ran down the list of question and said he thinks any county <br /> 7 facility can be considered. He said interior plaques should be used for buildings, and signage <br /> 8 should be used for parks. <br /> 9 He said any capital project should have a plaque, and all substantive renovations should <br /> 10 have a plaque, including the Whitted building. <br /> 11 He said the standard text should include the name of the building, the year of <br /> 12 construction, and the list of Commissioners and Construction team members. He said the <br /> 13 plaques should include the names of those Board of County Commissioners who are serving at <br /> 14 the time of opening. <br /> 15 Commissioner Gordon said to look back at examples of what was done in the past. She <br /> 16 is in favor of putting plaques in all buildings at the time of project completion. She thinks the <br /> 17 plaques should be placed on the interior. She said there should probably be a size threshold <br /> 18 as well as some consideration of how many plaques are already in the building. <br /> 19 She said listing the Board members serving at the time of completion is probably <br /> 20 easiest, but this can be discussed later. <br /> 21 Commissioner Price said she is concerned about the idea that people who made a <br /> 22 project happen might not be on the plaque if it only includes people on the Board when it was <br /> 23 completed. <br /> 24 Chair Jacobs said Chapel Hill includes the names of both past and present council <br /> 25 members who were involved at any point from project approval to completion. <br /> 26 Commissioner Pelissier agreed with Commissioner Dorosin's comments, however she <br /> 27 would include Commissioners names from the beginning of the project to the end. <br /> 28 Chair Jacobs said he agreed. He said he does feel that the contemporary County logo <br /> 29 should be on the plaque. <br /> 30 Chair Jacobs said there should be a size or function threshold. <br /> 31 Commissioner Gordon said she is convinced that plaques should include the Board of <br /> 32 County Commissioners that initiated the project. She said the decision has already been made <br /> 33 that the plaques currently being put up will be the old model. She clarified that the new logo <br /> 34 discussion is related to going forward. <br /> 35 Commissioner Rich said she likes the idea of putting plaques in after renovations, as it <br /> 36 shows the history of the building. <br /> 37 Commissioner Dorosin suggested a time capsule be built into the cornerstone for any <br /> 38 new building. <br /> 39 Commissioner Price suggested a limit be placed on the cost for the individual plaques. <br /> 40 Jeff Thompson said costs would be part of the CIP. <br /> 41 Chair Jacobs said he feels this is a great example of giving the Board options. <br /> 42 Jeff Thompson said he felt staff has enough input to proceed. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Michael Talbert referred back to item 7c for clarification. He noted that the motion did <br /> 45 not include approval of the technology design. He asked if this was to be delayed until more <br /> 46 information on the monitors and other items could be presented. <br /> 47 Chair Jacobs said there were more questions to be answered before the design was <br /> 48 approved. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 8. Reports NONE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.