Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
1/24/2014 2:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-23-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 1 Craig Benedict said he believes the email discussion today will put the Buckhorn project <br /> 2 in the Burlington/Graham priority list. <br /> 3 Chair Jacobs said this is important because it is in the middle of the Economic <br /> 4 Development District, and it is a bottleneck, especially as long as the flea market is there. He <br /> 5 noted that residents do not like the traffic immobility on weekends, and it would also be a more <br /> 6 attractive economic development area if people could drive through easily. <br /> 7 Chair Jacobs said one of the reasons the interstate funding has not gone forward is <br /> 8 because it has not been a priority in the past. He said the reason Interstate 40 stopped at the <br /> 9 Orange County line is because Orange County sued to block that route in the 1980's. He said it <br /> 10 has not been funded for the past 25 years, and he does not think this is a coincidence or a <br /> 11 function of district lines. He said it is more a function of the way the DOT used to operate, but <br /> 12 hopefully this is no longer the case. <br /> 13 Chair Jacobs suggested that staff use the front and back of pages to create larger <br /> 14 PowerPoint materials that the Board can more easily read the material. <br /> 15 Commissioner Dorosin asked about the substitute handout for 7C. He asked if this is to <br /> 16 replace 7C 3 in the original packet. <br /> 17 Brett Martin said the handout will supplant what was previously received. He said this <br /> 18 list is the only action item for tonight. He said the original list had all modes, but this list is <br /> 19 narrowed to the action item. He said a comprehensive list with all modes will come back to the <br /> 20 Board on the 19tH <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said he gets a feeling that no matter how the Board prioritizes or <br /> 22 ranks items, it will have little impact. He is not opposed to doing it, but he does question the <br /> 23 effectiveness. <br /> 24 Commissioner Gordon asked if Brett Martin had more to say on the transit projects. <br /> 25 Brett Martin said he wanted to make the strong point that a lot of the projects being <br /> 26 indicated would require a local match. He said the approval of the list tonight does not commit <br /> 27 the County to a local match. <br /> 28 Commissioner Gordon said there are two projects on the list for DCHC MPO —the <br /> 29 Hillsborough Train Station and the Buckhorn EDD. She noted that those projects were on the <br /> 30 original list, and now others have been added for a total of six. She said the Buckhorn EDD <br /> 31 was submitted to the Burlington/Graham MPO, and it is in that MPO. <br /> 32 Brett Martin said most of it is, but not all of it. <br /> 33 Commissioner Gordon said it appears to be on the border. <br /> 34 Brett Martin said there is a small area of this EDD in the DCHC planning area. He said <br /> 35 the intent of that project is to have it in the Mebane area. <br /> 36 Commissioner Gordon noted that there were previously two lists, one for TARPO and <br /> 37 one for DCHC, and she thought this was a good idea. She is not sure about the wisdom of <br /> 38 submitting one list to both organizations. <br /> 39 She believes what is being asked for is a resolution endorsing transit projects for the <br /> 40 TARPO regional priority list and the DCHC MPO regional priority list. She said these priority <br /> 41 lists will eventually go into the transportation improvement program. She asked if this is correct. <br /> 42 Brett Martin asked if this is about the title of the resolution. <br /> 43 Commissioner Gordon said this is in the title and the body. She read from the document. <br /> 44 Brett Martin said the MPO's regional priority list is the MPO'S TIP. <br /> 45 Commissioner Gordon said this is not stated in the materials. She asked if STIP <br /> 46 projects can be submitted later. <br /> 47 Brett Martin said the naming does not affect the action. He said anything that rolls up to <br /> 48 the STIP must first be on the TIP at the MPO level. He said the Board is not approving projects <br /> 49 to be included in a regional priority list. He said the goal is to be considered for inclusion in the <br /> 50 TIP, in order to roll up to the STIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.