Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
1/24/2014 2:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-23-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> 1 • Projects on staff-suggested priority list ranked to optimize scoring output and funding <br /> 2 probability, but list was also sensitive to local desires for those projects that are only <br /> 3 eligible for the Division funding tier. <br /> 4 • Staff carried forward projects submitted in last iteration of project prioritization as <br /> 5 starting point for considering projects in this iteration. <br /> 6 • Staff used the following strategy to rank suggested projects: <br /> 7 ➢ 1 st - Added capacity/mobility projects of local significance; <br /> 8 ➢ 2nd- Added capacity/mobility projects of statewide/regional significance; <br /> 9 ➢ 3rd - Transit/rail projects; <br /> 10 ➢ 4th — Bike/ped projects of local significance that require a 20% local match and <br /> 11 for projects to be locally administered. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Optimize Final Scores to Get Projects Funded While Also Addressing County's Most <br /> 14 Profound Transportation Needs <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Recommended Board Approach Moving Forward: <br /> 17 Action to take tonight: <br /> 18 Consider and endorse transit priority list by approving the resolution for transit-specific projects <br /> 19 for both TARPO and DCHS MPO (Refer to handouts). <br /> 20 Action for November 19th: <br /> 21 Consider and endorse TARPO and DCHC MPO priority lists by approving resolution for all <br /> 22 projects (including highway, bike/ped, transit). <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Brett Martin said the local MPO has a set number of input points that can be assigned to <br /> 25 projects on their list. <br /> 26 Bret Martin referred to the slides on how the Strategic Mobility Formula will work. He <br /> 27 said three tiers have now been established, and all of the money for transportation projects in <br /> 28 NC is divided into these three tiers over a ten year period (2016-2025). <br /> 29 He said the first tier is statewide mobility, which addresses projects of statewide <br /> 30 significance; and 40 percent of the money ($6 billion) would go to this tier. He said these <br /> 31 projects will not be selected based on any local input. He said these projects will be based 100 <br /> 32 percent on quantitative data. <br /> 33 Bret Martin said the only potential projects in Orange County that fall under this category <br /> 34 are 1-85, 1-40, and US 15-501. <br /> 35 He said the second tier is the regional tier, which receives 30 percent of the funds ($4.5 <br /> 36 billion). He noted that the selection of these projects is based 70 percent on quantitative data, <br /> 37 using the state's scoring process. The other 30 percent is based on local input. He said <br /> 38 everything eligible at the statewide tier is also available at the regional tier, as there is a <br /> 39 cascading effect of projects down through the tiers. This means that Interstate 85, Interstate <br /> 40 40, and US 15-501 are eligible, along with the other US and NC routes. <br /> 41 The last tier is for division needs, and it also receives 30 percent of the funds ($4.5 <br /> 42 billion). He said this tier is based 50 percent on quantitative data and 50 percent on local input. <br /> 43 This tier can include any of the projects from the previous tiers, as well as any other secondary <br /> 44 highways or road routes. <br /> 45 Brett Martin reviewed the regions and divisions on the map. He said Orange County is <br /> 46 matched up with the Triad, and this is who the County is competing with at the regional level. <br /> 47 He reviewed the Scoring Methodology charts from the PowerPoint, with a focus on the <br /> 48 changes. He noted the increased emphasis on quantitative data. He said there were <br /> 49 previously a highway mobility category and a highway modernization category, both with <br /> 50 different scoring factors. He said the modernization projects would favor rural areas, and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.