Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> for something to be done in violation of additional regulations. <br /> Staff Comment- Any change to a telecommunication facility has <br /> to demonstrate compliance with all applicable regulations. If the <br /> proposed change is inconsistent with these standards, it would <br /> not be allowed regardless of the permitting process (i.e. <br /> administrative, Board review, etc.). <br /> 2. A Board member asked if there were sufficient standards to <br /> address ancillary development on telecommunication facilities <br /> such as generators, solar panels, or other similar devices. <br /> Staff Comment- Staff believes there are sufficient safeguards <br /> within the UDO to address these issues. Nothing can be added <br /> to the telecommunication facility that is unnecessary for their <br /> operation and would represent a potential safety hazard. <br /> The Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed text <br /> amendment with the modification in language as recommended by the <br /> County Attorney's office on December 4, 2013. <br /> Agenda materials from this meeting can be viewed utilizing the following <br /> link- http://orangecountync.gov/planning/documents/DecPBPacket- <br /> Web.Qdf. <br /> b. Advisory Boards: <br /> c. Local Government Review: <br /> d. Notice Requirements <br /> Legal advertisement were published in accordance with the provisions of the <br /> UDO. <br /> e. Outreach- <br /> F-1 General Public- <br /> ........... <br /> F-1 Small Area Plan Workgroup- <br /> ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ <br /> Z Other- Staff has asked the County's current telecommunication consultant, <br /> the Center for Municipal Solutions, to review and comment on the <br /> I amendments. This review is part of their existing contract with the <br /> County and will not result in additional cost. <br /> They have offered no comment on the proposed amendments. <br /> 4. FISCAL IMPACT <br /> 5 <br />