Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 3:31:08 PM
Creation date
1/24/2014 2:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2014-11b
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 01-23-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-001 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance of Orange County incorporating State Law related changes to the Board of Adjustment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> The Board member asked if previously denied applications could re- <br /> apply based on the change in voting standards. <br /> STAFF RESPONSE: Section 2.2.8 of the UDO prohibits the submittal <br /> of: 'the same or similar amendment, affecting the same property or a <br /> portion of it' for a period of 1 year from the date of denial. <br /> Applicants who have had their Class B Special Use Permit requests <br /> denied will have to wait the required 1 year to re-file the application, <br /> which would then be subject to these revised voting standards. The <br /> change in voting provisions, however, does not impact the ability of a <br /> `denied' application to be re-filed in advance of established time limits. <br /> This is somewhat of a moot point as there has not been a Class B <br /> Special Use Permit application denied by the Board of Adjustment that <br /> could take advantage of the new voting standard. <br /> 3. Both the County Attorney and staff indicated they did not believe the <br /> changes would have a direct impact on the submittal of variance or <br /> special use permit applications. <br /> Staff indicated there had been only 1 variance case reviewed by the <br /> Board of Adjustment in the last 4 years. <br /> Agenda materials from the public hearing can be viewed <br /> at- http://orangecountync.gov/occlerks/131125.pdf. <br /> January 23, 2014 - Receive Planning Board recommendation. <br /> d. Other <br /> 2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br /> Mission/Scope: Public Hearing process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br /> Orange County ordinance requirements <br /> a. Planning Board Review- <br /> October 2, 2013 — Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). <br /> This item was reviewed at the October 2, 2013 ORC meeting where there <br /> were no comments from Board members. <br /> December 4, 2013 — Recommendation <br /> The Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the <br /> UDO text amendment as proposed by staff. <br /> Agenda materials from this meeting can be viewed utilizing the following <br /> link- http://orangecountync.gov/planning/documents/DecPBPacket- <br /> Web.pdf. <br /> ..............."I'l""I'll""I'll'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll'll""I'll""I'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'l'll""I'll""I'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'l'll""I'll""I'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'l'll""I'll""I'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'l'll""I'll""I'll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I............... <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.