Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 3:31:08 PM
Creation date
1/24/2014 2:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2014-11b
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 01-23-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-001 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance of Orange County incorporating State Law related changes to the Board of Adjustment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 2: Procedures 12 <br /> Section 2.10: Variances <br /> (2) A description of the specific modification sought by the applicant. For example, if <br /> the request is for a modification of a corner lot setback requirement, the applicant <br /> shall provide the exact reduction of the established corner lot setback requested <br /> as part of the application, <br /> (3) A plot plan, site plan, or other similar document(s)denoting the physical impact <br /> of the proposed request on the parcel, <br /> (4) A narrative outlining the answers to the five required findings detailed within <br /> Section 2.10.3 of the Ordinance justifying the issuance of the variance, and <br /> (5) Copies of any additional information deemed essential by the applicant justifying <br /> the approval of the request. <br /> 2.10.3 Authorized Variances <br /> A variance may be approved by the Board of Adjustment in cases involving where astical <br /> difficulties or unnecessary hardships would result from carrying out the strict letter of the <br /> Ordinance,when substantial evidence in the official record of the application supports all of the <br /> following findings: <br /> (A) The alleged hardships or practical difficulties are unique and singular to the-pr-epeFtsof <br /> the applicant and arc not suffered in common with other property similarly <br /> locatedUnnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the Ordinance. It <br /> shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no <br /> reasonable use can be made of the property. <br /> {B) The alleged hardships and practical difficulties that would result from failure to grant the <br /> variance extend to the inability-to- se the land in question for any reasonable use in <br /> -- - •• - - - - - £ - - -- - - - -- - - - etho mere <br /> inconvenience and inability to attain a higher financial return.2 <br /> {e-}(B) The hardship results from conditions that are preculiar to the property, such as location, <br /> size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal circumstances, as well as <br /> hardships resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from <br /> conditions that are common to the neighborhood or general public, may riot be the basis <br /> for granting a variance. The variance, if approved, will not substantially interfere with or <br /> injure the rights of others whose property would be affected by approval of the variance. <br /> {0)(C) The variance is in harmony with and serves the general intent and purpose of this <br /> Ordinance and the adopted Comprehensive PlanThe hardship did not result from actions <br /> taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with <br /> knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not <br /> ������ be regarded as a self-created hardship.•�L.1_` ee - - _ - -- - --- - • - - -- -- •Jering both the <br /> --. _ _--- - _ . .. -_ . e _ -- -*e •- • _• <br /> -al hardships that <br /> - - - - - - - •- _-- - - '- - ---- _ _ _ - - aThe requested <br /> variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the Ordinance, such that <br /> public safety is secured and substantial justice is achieved.3 <br /> 2 Recent revisions to State Law include language indicating it shall: `not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the <br /> absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property'. As a result we can no longer have such <br /> language in the UDO to the contrary. <br /> 3 Portions of existing subsections(D)and(E)have been combined to reflect wording changes in State law with <br /> respect to the required findings for the granting of a variance. Staff has modified this entire section to ensure <br /> required findings are consistent with new language in State law. <br /> Orange County,North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.