Browse
Search
Minutes 05-21-2013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Minutes 05-21-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2014 10:52:13 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 3:05:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 4c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 8c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 8d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-11g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-21-2013-13 (4)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2013-017 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #10 for FY 2012-13
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
RES-2013-042 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
RES-2013-043 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
David King said there are a lot of uncertainties, such as the New Hope Creek area. He <br /> said there is an alignment that was committed to, but TT also committed to looking at an <br /> alignment close to 15-501. He said if this happens to be a clean and quick decision on the <br /> part of all parties involved then the cost will fall in the low range. If not, then it will fall in the <br /> higher range. He said there is too much uncertainty around this issue. He said there is similar <br /> uncertainly with the Meadowmont versus 54 east. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she feels it is important to continue to provide these <br /> explanations. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she assumes that the timeline goal is early 2014 for <br /> implementation of bus capital projects. <br /> John Tallmadge said that will depend upon the consensus of what is being done. He <br /> said that TT does anticipate increasing Southpoint service and frequency of service to UNC <br /> prior to the start of the fall semester. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if there is room in the budget for advertising and outreach to <br /> notify of changes in service or frequency. <br /> John Tallmadge said that is part of Triangle Transit's current budget. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said the Board does need details in the budget. She said she <br /> sees it at their board meetings at Triangle Transit and it should be shared with the public. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked about performance standards and the need to develop <br /> them. She presumed that the performance standards for the regional routes would be the <br /> same as current routes. <br /> David King said that is correct. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked about the time frame for developing performance <br /> standards for Chapel Hill Transit routes and rural routes, as these would provide guidance in <br /> making decisions. <br /> John Tallmadge said that the anticipation is to do that within the 6 month planning <br /> window. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked where the public can get information on all of the new <br /> routes. <br /> David King said the public can go to triangletransit.org or to call the call center. He said <br /> that OPT routes are not in that system, and that can be worked on. He referenced a new app <br /> that follows buses on Google Maps. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked if Chapel Hill has a direct link to the Triangle Transit <br /> website and OPT. <br /> John Tallmadge clarified if this is referring to services that exist today. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said as the plan goes forward, she would like to see this for <br /> future routes. <br /> John Tallmadge said TT is talking about where to house this information. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier suggested inclusion of links to the various governmental <br /> bodies. <br /> Chair Jacobs said there was a spirited exchange involving rail advocates and the town <br /> manager of Hillsborough regarding changes that might affect the planning of the Hillsborough <br /> Train Station. He asked David King to get back to the Board with an analysis of those emails. <br /> David King said he would do that. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the process that Triangle Transit has outlined to engage the <br /> residents is comforting. He said that part of the problem is that there are terms that mean one <br /> thing to Triangle Transit and mean another to Orange County. He said that having a public <br /> engagement process will help deal with this. He feels comfortable that TT and the Board have <br /> heard each other. <br /> David King said collaboration is collaboration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.