Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-10-2013 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 12-10-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-10-2013 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2013 3:01:02 PM
Creation date
12/6/2013 3:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 12-10-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 — Language now similar to that found in state statute and Carrboro ordinance <br /> 2 — Summary of Public Concerns cont. <br /> 3 Watchdog definition <br /> 4 — Existing language in current ordinance: § 4-37. "A dog that barks and threatens <br /> 5 to bite any intruder that has not been specially trained or conditioned for that <br /> 6 purpose." [pg 8 in strikethrough version of recommended ordinance] <br /> 7 — Barking and threatening to bite on owner's property does not qualify the dog as <br /> 8 potentially dangerous or vicious- hence the definition is meaningless. Once a <br /> 9 dog bites, it no longer meets requirements of watchdog <br /> 10 — This language was removed from proposed ordinance <br /> 11 The distinction between rural and urban has been removed <br /> 12 — Where significant differences occur between the municipal and county <br /> 13 ordinances, they will be retained in the municipal code of ordinances <br /> 14 Examples: tethering, crowing roosters, livestock, chicken coops <br /> 15 none of these examples are included in the unified ordinance <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Chair Jacobs acknowledged Susan Elmore's work on the ASAB and with this process. <br /> 18 Susan Elmore, ASAB Chair, DVM presented the following slides: <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Summary of Public Concerns cont. <br /> 21 No School of Government involvement and no public input <br /> 22 — Susan Elmore, ASAB Chair, DVM <br /> 23 <br /> 24 ASAB and Public Process <br /> 25 • ASAB Chair spoke with Associate Professor Aimee Wall, UNC School of Government <br /> 26 • ASAB & Agricultural Preservation Board officers, along with senior staff of Animal <br /> 27 Services and DEAPR, met to discuss livestock concerns with ordinance <br /> 28 • ASAB Chair also spoke with a local farmer on matters related to at-large livestock and <br /> 29 other issues that might affect county farmers <br /> 30 • ASAB considered the ordinance 3 times prior to June 4th BOCC meeting <br /> 31 — ASAB is comprised of Orange County residents who have been appointed by the <br /> 32 BOCC to review such issues <br /> 33 — One meeting dedicated to vicious/dangerous dog declarations and residents <br /> 34 were invited to speak and their concerns were heard <br /> 35 Since June 4th BOCC meeting, ASAB met again to discuss ordinance and they <br /> 36 unanimously recommended BOCC adoption <br /> 37 The ASAB 2014 work plan will include a review of targeted items on the unified <br /> 38 ordinance <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Bob Marotto reviewed the following slide: <br /> 41 <br /> 42 What the Unified Ordinance Is <br /> 43 • A unification of the existing ordinances that <br /> 44 — fills gaps <br /> 45 — makes it possible to efficiently protect the public and carry out services <br /> 46 — avoids existing confusion within department, public and court system <br /> 47 • A fluid document that still allows for differences between municipalities and county <br /> 48 where needed <br /> 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.