Orange County NC Website
523 <br /> FOR APPROVAL OF A FINANCING AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED BY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE 16OA-20 • <br /> WHEREAS, the County of Orange, North Carolina desires to purchase <br /> land that will ultimately be used for the construction of a Human <br /> Services Center in southern Orange County to better serve the citizens <br /> of Orange County; and <br /> WHEREAS, the County of Orange desires to finance the project by <br /> the use of an installment contract authorized under North Carolina <br /> General Statute 160A, Article 3 , Section 20; and <br /> WHEREAS, findings of fact by this governing body must be <br /> presented to enable the North Carolina Local Government Commission to <br /> make its findings of fact set forth in North Carolina General Statute <br /> 159, Article 8, Section 151 prior to approval of the proposed contract; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners <br /> of Orange County, North Carolina, meeting in regular session on the <br /> fifth day of August, 1991, make the following findings of fact: <br /> 1. The proposed contract is necessary or expedient because <br /> a. The acquisition of property for construction of a Southern <br /> Human Services Center is a priority of the Board of County <br /> Commissioners and is an integral part of the County's 5 <br /> year Capital Improvement Plan. <br /> b. Because of the prime location of the property, the total <br /> cost exceeded the funds appropriated in the Capital <br /> Improvement Plan. <br /> c. Acquisition of the property in the proposed contract will 0 <br /> allow the County to centralize it's Human Service <br /> operations in the Chapel Hill area and provide better <br /> accessibility to the citizens who require such services. <br /> 2 . The proposed contract is preferable to a bond issue for the <br /> same purpose because <br /> a. Expenses associated with a bond issue of this size would <br /> be prohibitive. <br /> b. The amount to be financed under the contract, ($302 , 500) <br /> is minimal when compared to the projects the County has <br /> historically included in the previous bond referendums yet <br /> falls within the category of projects which the County has <br /> previously financed by use of installment purchase <br /> contracts. <br /> c. The amount proposed within the contract exceeds what can <br /> be prudently raised by the County from it's current <br /> resources. Fund balance has been appropriated in the <br /> current year to fund operations. Further appropriations <br /> could adversely impact the fund balance next year by <br /> causing it to fall below the 8% level. <br /> d. The County currently can not issue bonds under the "two- <br /> thirds limitation" because there was not a reduction in th <br /> County' s net debt at June 30, 1991. The County retire <br /> debt on previously issued bonds but issued new bonds in <br /> excess of the bonds which were retired. <br />