Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890530
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890530
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 11:56:19 AM
Creation date
12/3/2013 11:56:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/30/1989
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
301 <br /> County Subsidy of Volunteer Services $105,000 <br /> County Subsidy of Daytime Services 613.000 <br /> Total $718,000 <br /> Tax Rate Equivalent 2.1 cents <br /> Link indicated that the revenue from fees would generate $244,000 for the first <br /> year. The approach recommended would reduce the amount of tax burden to $519,000. <br /> Most of the revenue would be produced through private insurance and <br /> Medicaid/Medicare. Only a small portion of private citizens would be directly billed <br /> and in those cases payment would be based on ability to pay. Some of the EMS <br /> volunteers take issue with the study because it does not reflect their contributions <br /> and resources to the EMS system. They believe that a complete analysis should <br /> reflect their hours of time, training, equipment, and facilities to show what a total <br /> EMS system costs. They also take issue with the timing of the study and the <br /> implementation, believing that July 1st is too quick for implementation. They also <br /> take philosophical issue with charging a fee for volunteer time and use of rescue <br /> squad equipment. They believe that fees will cause contributions to diminish. There <br /> are other issues, but these are some of the major ones. <br /> Link reviewed other increases for the upcoming year. The largest increases go <br /> toward schools, and debt service. Other increases are in the areas of human <br /> services, public works, public safety, outside agencies, and general administration. <br /> Economic Development is a high priority for the county and the implementation of the <br /> Economic Development Strategic Plan is being recommended. That will require funds <br /> for additional staff to help accomplish those goals. In the Public Works Department <br /> recommendations include a solid waste manager, and a building and grounds supervisor, <br /> to enhance the solid waste program. At the same time the tipping fees will be <br /> increased. In Public Safety the implementation of Phase II of the DARE program, and <br /> the addition of a Deputy Emergency Services Director, has been recommended. The <br /> Social Services Department is expanding public assistance programs due to mandated <br /> program enhancements. Specifically, two Public Assistance case workers, and a nurse <br /> supervisor for the in-home care program, are being recommended. These new positions <br /> are being recommended for the Health Department. The Animal Control Officer, Public <br /> Health Nurse-Family Planning Clinics, and a Social Worker (part-time) to coordinate <br /> "baby love" program are also being recommended. Personnel is being recommended for <br /> two new positions to assist in the Classification Study and to administer the <br /> Employee Training and Development program. In the General Administration the <br /> creation of a Budget Office is being recommended. That office will operate as an arm <br /> of the Manager's office. <br /> The recommendation for the education budgets is for a per student increase from <br /> $967 to $1042. This is a 10% increase in county funding for schools current expense. <br /> The recommendation also includes using the discretionary capital funds for removal of <br /> asbestos in both school systems. The issue of school equity has been studied over <br /> the last year. Agreement has been reached on definitions and objectives. A <br /> financial model has been reached by county staff and will be presented. The goal is <br /> to reach equity within 5 or 6 years. The goal is to reach funding equity only, not <br /> programmatic equity. Funding will never be exactly the same and a 4% to 5% variance <br /> is thought to be acceptable. In pursuing equity, it needs to be clear that the <br /> taxpayers in Orange County will pay more taxes during the course of this effort. <br /> That's fair because they will be achieving a greater increase in funding during the <br /> same time. A special District Tax could address the question of equity. This tax <br /> would be applied to the entire county. The county tax could be raised as the Chapel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.