Minutes - 19860417 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

135 Nat Smith, resident of Pine Street in Carrboro, noted that he felt the residents of Carrboro do have a stake in what is being proposed for the Calvander area. He has always enjoyed bicycling in the Calvander area and that many other residents of Carrboro derive much pleasure out of Calvander remaining as it is. He pointed out that there is retail space available at Willow Creek and Plantation Plaza and he could not see the need to create more office and retail space. Jerry Koontz, resident of Barrington Hills, Carrboro, spoke in opposition to the rezoning proposed for the Calvander area and also in opposition to the routing of the northern loop arterial. His statement is as follows: "I don't want an industrial park in my back yard. And that's literally where it is going to be. Two of my property lines are Carrboro city limits. It will be exactly in my backyard. The proposed buffers around the industrial area are inadequate and inappropriate because they allow for high density development which I guess is consistent with that proposed industrial use and use as a retail center. One of my big concerns is just what uses are permitted in an industrial park. The Carrboro Planning Staff has said, according to Carrboro definitions this would include assembly, wholesale distribution, mail order and other uses of similar character. The problem is that I don't know who to believe; whose guidelines are we going to use to control the use of this area; will it be Carrboro's, Chapel Hill 's or Orange County's. We don't know and until we know what the proposed uses are going to be I don't see how anyone can make a decision on whether or not to adopt this plan. Many people have already commented on the inadequacy of the roads in the area and I will not dwell on that, but what I don't want to happen is I do not want Homestead Road and Old 86 to become another Highway 54 By-Pass. One question which has already been raised and I ' ll raise it again, I want to know who is proposing this. Just who is it that wants an industrial park there and if anyone will admit to wanting an industrial park there, I want to know why they want an industrial park there. No one that I have heard speak today or before, wants an industrial park there. We have already addressed the fallacy of creating jobs for people in the area and I think that argument can be dismissed very quickly. But, one other reason for having an industrial park in this area, I think needs further attention. That is the idea of shifting the tax burden from the residential homeowner in Carrboro to an industrial client in the area. The Carrboro Planning Staff says, 'We have no proposal to annex this area' . Now, quite frankly, I find it very inconsistent to say that we are going to have an industrial park in this area to enhance our tax base and yet not intend to annex the area, otherwise you can't increase the tax base. I think this needs to be considered very carefully. I think that what people will find if they study carefully newly annexed areas is that most often they do not even generate enough revenue to pay for the costs of providing services to them. Well, I know what is going to happen whether or not Carrboro tax base is increased by an industrial node at Calvander, my taxes are going to go up one way or another. So it makes no difference really. I don't think that anyone can propose any plausible argument to show how building an industrial park at Calvander is going to decrease my taxes. Now there have been mentioned before alternates to the northern loop and I just want to say that I would strongly recommend that all the judicial bodies present this evening to