Browse
Search
Minutes - 19860417
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Minutes - 19860417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 12:30:52 PM
Creation date
12/2/2013 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/1986
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
129 <br /> there which would leave Blackwood Station much as it is now. At the <br /> NC 86/I-40 Interchange, office uses are recommended nearest the <br /> interchange and high density residential uses farther from the <br /> interchange because of traffic noise. Because of a pending <br /> development application as well as the current plan, it is <br /> recommended that an office park type arrangement be at Homestead Road <br /> and Rogers Road which would place equal distance between major <br /> activity nodes. Another change in the revised plan was the <br /> combination of the two nodes in the Calvander area. In the plan <br /> presented on January 14, 1986, a commercial/industrial node was shown <br /> east of Calvander on Homestead Road. The rural neighborhood node at <br /> Calvander which was designated in the 1981 plan was retained as a <br /> separate node. These two nodes were separated by a high density <br /> residential area. In the revised plan the high density residential <br /> area was replaced with office/institutional and the two nodes <br /> combined into one. The other change was a breakdown of the urban <br /> growth boundary into 10 and 20 year periods to be consistent with the <br /> existing Land Use Plan. He indicated on the map the areas where <br /> gravity sewer service could be extended easily. Collins noted that a <br /> number of inquiries have already been received about development <br /> around the I-40/NC 86 Interchange and a great deal of development <br /> activity is occurring out Erwin Road. The feeling of staffs and <br /> Boards was that development would be increasing in this area within <br /> the next ten years. He stated that the boundary of the ten year <br /> transition west of NC 86 paralleled Homestead Road 500 ' to the north. <br /> He stated that the Planning Staffs of Orange County, Chapel Hill and <br /> Carrboro felt that high density uses should be within 500 ' of an <br /> arterial to provide access, reduce the length of trips and reduce <br /> traffic through lower density areas. He indicated that the remainder <br /> of the transition area lay in the Bolin Creek basin was being <br /> designated Twenty Year Transition. This area has been experiencing <br /> some growth pressures, but not as intense as in the Ten Year <br /> Transition areas. He mentioned the County's current land use policy <br /> of clustering development in transition areas to reduce urban sprawl <br /> and stated the policy would probably be carried over into Joint <br /> Planning. He mentioned that the Ten Year Transition Area would be <br /> the focus of current development proposals and that only after the <br /> area had begun to fill up would development be channeled toward the <br /> Twenty Year Transition areas. One means of implementing phased <br /> development in the transition areas would be through the formulation <br /> of a Water and Sewer policy. <br /> Roger Waldon, Chapel Hill Planning Director, noted that the <br /> Chapel Hill Planning Board would consider the revised plan on April <br /> 29th. <br /> He noted that the Chapel Hill Planning Board' s main concern deals <br /> with the rural buffer. One recommendation of the Chapel Hill <br /> Planning Board was for low density, the highest to be one unit to two <br /> acres, with wells and septic tanks. The recommendation excludes the <br /> extension of water and sewer and package plants. The Board supports <br /> mixed use at the interchanges and the areas where there is to be new <br /> development. There is strong support to protect the University Lake <br /> Watershed and the I 40/New Hope Church Road Interchange (considering <br /> them as part of the rural buffer) . It is hoped that by the end of <br /> April the Chapel Hill Planning Board will forward their <br /> recommendations to the Chapel Hill Town Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.