Browse
Search
Minutes - 19860417
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Minutes - 19860417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 12:30:52 PM
Creation date
12/2/2013 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/1986
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
143 <br /> whose families had for generations lived in the area and wished to <br /> keep it residential. Using the maps, Ms. Bristol indicated locations <br /> of individual properties and explained the need for preservation of <br /> the forest lands and homelands. She expressed concern that property <br /> owners like herself wished to leave the homes to their families and <br /> have the community remain as residential. <br /> Larry Reid noted that the same serious concerns regarding the <br /> landfill had already been expressed by previous speakers. Alternative <br /> methods of handling garbage, rather than use of landfills, need to be <br /> found. He continued as follows: "The second item I would like to <br /> speak on is the possibility or the proposal that Carrboro and the <br /> Town of Chapel Hill has had about dividing my community by using <br /> Rogers Road as a dividing line for the municipalities to create their <br /> jurisdictional range. I wish that that line be drawn through an area <br /> that would not break a community in half. " Mr. Reid expressed a <br /> concern that plans were being made for properties without input from <br /> the owners and that "officials were elected to represent, not <br /> dictate" . <br /> Bob Bonar, resident of New Hope Church Road community, presented <br /> a petition with 19 names to add to those previously entered, and <br /> noted that he was pleased that the rural buffer is to be retained for <br /> the I- 40/New Hope Church Road interchange. He noted that with the <br /> substantial amount of environmentally sensitive areas and lack of <br /> water and sewer, it is hard to understand why this area was chosen <br /> for office/institutional and industrial uses. "It appears that the <br /> only reason it was chosen is because I-40 is there. " He stated he <br /> felt it is very important "now and in future years that the County <br /> consider other aspects of the appropriateness of the land around I-40 <br /> and its interchanges, that we not automatically assume that because <br /> DOT put the highway through this particular point, we must therefore <br /> have non-residential uses. You do not expand improved tax base by <br /> designating an area for non- residential use when it is not really <br /> suited for that purpose. " <br /> Gary Saleeby stated he felt it clear that light industrial use <br /> that allows such things as rock quarries at New Hope Church Road <br /> interchange would be inappropriate as well as a rural buffer around <br /> this interchange. He felt the reaction was based on fear. A balance <br /> of uses would be appropriate such as office/institutional, light <br /> industrial (specify carefully what this could be) for the convenience <br /> of residents traveling I-40 to places of employment such as the <br /> Research Triangle Area. <br /> Carmine Prioli, a Stoneycreek resident, noted that Stoneycreek <br /> residents wished to keep the New Hope Church Road interchange as a <br /> rural buffer area. He indicated he had a list of many facts to prove <br /> the reasons for keeping this as a rural buffer. He expressed thanks <br /> that this industrial node had been removed from the plan and wished <br /> it to remain so. <br /> Steven Garfunkel, a resident of Barrington Hills noted two <br /> concerns about the Calvander Industrial node. 1) the concern that he <br /> lives near where the road dead ends and pressure would sometime in <br /> the future be such to carry this road on through into another <br /> residential area which would severely change the character of the <br /> neighborhood, and (2) the implications of placing an industrial node <br /> in an area so out of character. It is particularly troublesome since <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.