Orange County NC Website
101 <br /> notation that the County controlled a specified portion of lands <br /> immediately surrounding the lake. He noted that the original survey of <br /> the lake property contained the referenced notation regarding the <br /> reservation of the land under county control. However, he had prepared <br /> the deeds in question from a subsequent survey which did not contain <br /> the notation regarding county control of adjoining property. <br /> Loftin concluded stating that the landowners around the lake <br /> cannot deed title to land owned by Lake Orange Incorporated. <br /> Commissioner Marshall indicated she understood that these mistakes <br /> do happen and inquired if any structures had been erected within the <br /> disputed area. Loftin responded that he was not aware of any <br /> structures. Commissioner Marshall noted that some owners had claimed <br /> that their houses would be flooded. <br /> Commissioner Lloyd clarified that the lake level is contour 614 <br /> and that Lake Orange Corporation owns from contour 615-620. <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill, County Attorney, inquired if any of the <br /> erroneous deeds are more than seven years old. Loftin responded that no <br /> visible boundaries had been established nor the area occupied. <br /> Ray commented that the dam was designed to handle an additional <br /> two feet which, if constructed, would provide enough time for the <br /> construction of another reservoir. <br /> Bobby Nichols, member of the Lake Orange Corporation, commented <br /> that given a shortage of storage capacity that raising the dam two feet <br /> would provide a 25% increase in storage capacity. He noted that pier <br /> owners needed permission from the Lake Orange Corporation to construct <br /> these facilities. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit questioned a safe yield of 25%. Ken <br /> Thompson, County Manager, responded that the 25% referred to acre <br /> volume. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit referred the matter to the staff for <br /> recommendation. <br /> Joyce Brown presented a statement on the Scotswood project. She <br /> noted that there is a diversity in Hillsborough evidenced by those of <br /> varying economic status living side-by-side. She felt that a planned <br /> development would not provide for this type of diversity. She <br /> expressed concerns with traffic problems and expressed a desire for <br /> heavier control over the project. She expressed a concern with <br /> potential air quality problems as experienced by Durham and Raleigh. <br /> She felt that a new development was unfairly taking precedence. <br /> Tom Metzguer expressed concern about additional traffic on Miller <br /> Road without any improvements suggested thereby creating a hazardous <br /> situation. He noted that Lawrence Road is presently unpaved and cited <br /> design problems with Old #10. He indicated that he had learned by word <br /> of mouth of an additional 100 homes north of Scotswood. <br /> John Hartwell addressed the use of Lawrence Road as a bypass. He <br />