Minutes - 19860401 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Carey noted that NCDOT cannot then assure satisfaction with Hillsborough's recommendation regarding the widening of US 70. Commissioner Willhoit noted that the situation regarding the need for funding will worsen. Watkins commented that there is a serious shortfall and that he hopes the legislature will address the funding needs. He added that Orange County has for many years required that additional right-of-way adjacent to major roads be provided through the development process, a requirement not found elsewhere. Tom Metzguer cited a discrepancy in the abstract on page two which cited a service level "C" and indicated 7500 trips per day versus the 17000 trips per day noted by Watkins. Planning Director Marvin Collins indicated that the figure used in the abstract was obtained from Dwight Kelly, NCDOT. Watkins responded that he was not sure of the figures, but that Dr. Goode of the Transportation Planning Department concurred with his estimates. He added that in urban areas roads may carry more traffic than anticipated and improvements are made only at the critical points. Commissioner Lloyd inquired how the project compares in the context of phasing with other areas of the state in the ability of the road system to handle the traffic generated. He asked if NCDOT speaks to needs within a reasonable period of time. Watkins responded that each situation is unique and that local governing boards need to keep in touch with the Board of Transportation and present their needs. Commissioner Lloyd referred to the comment regarding traffic around Cameron Park School and indicated that most of the traffic will be on US 70. Watkins responded that the traffic consultant for the project had better data than NCDOT. He added that most of the traffic will travel east on US 70 and that there would be an increase in traffic traveling south on St. Mary's Road. Pilkey noted that she lives on US 70 and asked what percentage of the ultimate traffic generated by the development would travel east on US 70. Watkins again suggested that the traffic consultant answer the question given his better data base. Grainger Barrett, representing the applicants, presented a statement on the project. He noted that the planned development process provides advantages, not shortcomings, in the provision of improvements, expectations and a unified development approach to the development of the property. Barrett commented on the water usage issue noting that a moratorium was not necessary. He continued that the sense of urgency was clear and that the Board needs to set policy, make choices and implement these choices. He noted the Burlington option is subject to definitive contracts and technical details; the Seven Mile Creek option is subject to planning and site acquisition; and that other options are