Orange County NC Website
58 <br /> of housing in the Chapel Hill area and they would like to <br /> address that need. He cited the location of this tract of <br /> land as a definite asset. The housing will range from <br /> $125, 000 to $200, 000 price range. <br /> Chair Willhoit cited problems associated with the <br /> development of the land use plan for that area. This area is <br /> in the Carrboro Joint Planning Area and yet it is remote <br /> from the city limits. He asked for comments on a possible <br /> scenario if this request is approved and the subdivision <br /> built. Would it be voluntarily annexed by Carrboro or would <br /> it be annexed by Chapel Hill? <br /> Buzz Lloyd indicated his choice of a scenario would be where <br /> the County would grant the zoning, the development would be <br /> built and they would not be involved with seeking <br /> annexation. <br /> Planning Board member Chris Best asked about the school the <br /> children from this area would attend and was told they would <br /> attend Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools. He questioned if the <br /> developer was concerned that the schools were already <br /> operating at capacity and Buzz Lloyd indicated that the <br /> development is not gaged by the schools but that by the time <br /> more schools will be necessary they will be built. <br /> Chair Willhoit outlined the costs involved for providing <br /> school space for additional children that this development <br /> would generate. More classrooms will be needed which <br /> means taxes will need to be raised or a bond issue will be <br /> necessary to build new schools or seek authority to charge <br /> an impact fee to accumulate capital for new schools. <br /> Commissioner Marshall noted that Carrboro is one of the few <br /> municipalities which has gained enabling legislation to levy <br /> impact fees. Because of these fees, they can move toward a <br /> higher density development because the developers will be <br /> able to help pay for the services. This will have an impact <br /> upon the services that must be provided by county <br /> governments. She agrees with the developer that it is the <br /> responsibility of the county to build the schools as <br /> necessary but the complications of when and how to get the <br /> money needs to be recognized at all times. <br /> Commissioner Carey asked how far the sewer lines were from <br /> the project and Buzz Lloyd indicated 4, 000 to 5, 000 feet. <br /> COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS <br /> JIM FURMAN, owner of one of the lots adjacent to the <br /> proposed project expressed concern about the density and the <br /> slope of the area which may lead to increased runoff and <br /> flooding in that area. <br /> Larry Reid, resident close to the new development, expressed <br /> concern about the density and inquired about the necessity <br /> for one-half acre lots when the lots in that area are R-1. <br /> Buzz Lloyd indicated that the value of the land and <br /> economics would dictate a density of R-2 . <br /> Mary Jullian questioned the difference in the acreage as <br /> shown on the tax map and what the applicant is requesting to <br /> be rezoned. Susan Smith indicated the applicant is only <br /> requesting that a portion of the tax lot be rezoned and <br /> pointed out that area on the map. <br /> Chair Willhoit indicated he spoke with Mayor Porto and there <br />