Orange County NC Website
i <br /> 59 RAI MDAD UALIZATION SUI <br /> To approve not intervening in the Railroad Equalization ' <br /> for 1984 and 19;85, <br /> n u�t <br /> 66 WA T�,WATER COLLECTION AND PURCHASE CONTRACT AMENDMENT <br /> To postpone this item until a later meeting. <br /> 7+ BUDQET AMENDMENT <br /> To 4pprove amending the 1985-86 Bud et Dr <br /> appropriate funds from � Commissioners,� Budget Ordinance to <br /> I i he Commissioners Contingency to the <br /> Commissioners account for payment of a special assessment t ' <br /> used in an effo�t to save the Fe that will �� <br /> Federal General Revenue Sharing Program. <br /> 8• RIGHT! OF WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPART <br /> TRANSPORTATION "lEN1' ' <br /> To approve the right-of-way encroachment agreement for the <br /> Efland- heeks T6wnship sanitary sewer facilities with <br /> Transportation end author' the Department of <br /> e the Chair to sign <br /> 90 FEE ?EST FOR TEMPORARY SOCIAL WORKER I POSITION <br /> To approve a temporary full-time Social Worker I <br /> effective F`ehruc,ry 1 thru June 19866 <br /> Position <br /> Motion, was made h� Commissioner <br /> Lloyd, seconded her <br /> Commissioner Marshall that the forgoing action he take <br /> VOTE: UNANJMoU the Board, <br /> Go ITEMS FOR DECISION <br /> L0_0 P & S SPORTING GOODS INC. (A copy of the legal . <br /> Attorney eoffry Gledhill is in the 'permanent opinion from. <br /> Attorne agenda <br /> Geoff Gledhill summarized the main points in his <br /> letter to the ! Commissioners, He lie P <br /> listed four recommendations for <br /> consideration by the Board: <br /> (1) Consider the zoning charge application without regard to <br /> the intended use of the applicant <br /> ( ) Consider the zoning change application in <br /> 8 the context of <br /> there already being .5 acres of commercial pro pert ,in <br /> this activity node with the zoning � � <br /> normally, � g rd�nan�e permxtt�ng� <br /> y, a maximum of 10 acres. <br /> ( ) birect the staff to correct the improper zoning <br /> 4esignations in this node and. any other similar <br /> that may exist throughout the County, <br /> errors <br /> (4) PIire t the staff to develop a new use which <br /> end, of business in includes the <br /> question here and. which has minimal <br /> olff-site impacts. This new use should refe <br /> special use with t p rab].y he a <br /> .e application criteria focused on <br /> h;uffers, screening, site plan review traffic <br /> and the lie. Included in t . management <br /> his staff review should he a <br /> r�Beommendation concerning where this new erm use/Special use/ P s use <br /> would be permitted.P ed. The kind. of use in question <br /> i <br /> certainly s not a "glom and Pop" operation. However, ' <br /> �mtpats on the neighborhood ltd ocated <br /> are mini'mal because its activity is conf ined. within a <br /> s�ruoture with little comings and goings to and fry <br /> struetur�e. For these rease hn� that <br /> reasons this use may e one <br /> permitted more pervasive) than f <br /> any other use that's not <br /> y focused. This should be addressed by the <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br />