Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
i <br /> I <br /> ti ■ <br /> 5 <br /> benefits are ne�eded so that women could become more independent* This <br /> study evaluated how the fringe, benefits of today meet the needs eels <br /> Verlai Ins o listed the five recommendations <br /> (1) A copy of the report with a covering letter should be se <br /> to the 220 orig.�r�al l surveyed Orange �� <br /> County employers and to other <br /> county employers who could use the report to evaluate their own employee benefit paokage. Employers should be urged to (1) consider a <br /> cafeteria. <br /> style approach and ( ) survey their employees if necessary o obtain <br /> information on which benefits are y tar <br /> needed. but not offered. <br /> ( ) ' A copy of this report should be sent to the No <br /> Carolina Legislative stud. Commission North <br /> reviewing cafeteria style benefits <br /> for state employees. <br /> ( ) ' Employees of orange County government should be surveyed <br /> to determine the need for additional benefits and. the feasibility of <br /> cafeteria-style approach. y a <br /> (4) The Orange County Board of commissioners should form an <br /> intergovernmental l task force charged to determine, through a survey <br /> other appropriate means the need. for � or <br /> r cafeteria style benefit plans. <br /> (5) The commission for women and the Orange Count <br /> Commiss.�oners, at an appropriate for the public and <br /> � y Board of <br /> time, should sponsor <br /> private sector a forum on the cafeteria,-style fringe benefit concept, <br /> ncept. <br /> motion' was made by Commissioner Marshall. seconded. <br /> commissioner Carey to adopt the re � by <br /> p port requesting that the Commission <br /> for Women address the first two recommendations as s <br /> address recommendatior� three during con as possible, <br /> x g the 1986 -87 Fiscal Year and look at <br /> the possibility of including the forum in their budget f <br /> that recommendation five not be a g ,or 86-87 and <br /> ddressed. until the forum is completed.. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOU . <br /> A dis6ussion was held on recommendation four and five <br /> was decided th�.t Verla Ins] o and the �Ve and. It <br /> County Manager would. bring back to <br /> the Board for further consideration a charge for the t <br /> further oonside�ation, <br /> g ash force for <br /> F. ITEMS FOR DECISION-CONSENT AGENDA <br /> The county Manager recommended the following ction b the • <br /> 1• ABANDONMENT OF 8R 1547 -- � � Board: <br /> �RA� I-�E� 1 �A� <br /> To approve a petition for abandonment of 914 miles <br /> Bradsher Road arid, forward to NDO T. of Ft1, 47 <br /> 29 ANNUAL NDOT CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 1985 <br /> Construction pr�oiects which indicates To accept the status report on the 1985 Secondary Road <br /> he nature of the improvements <br /> stage of completion and funds upended for each 'ro ect. <br /> p � <br /> ADDITION To SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM <br /> To reo1eive and approve a secondary road addition et' <br /> Maple Avenue se�v�.ng the Lucius M. h petition for <br /> Cheshire subdivision and forward <br /> recommendation t6 NCDOT. <br /> 4. RENEi LING PUBLIC HEARING FOR CLOSURE of A PORTION OF OLD <br /> E DAR GROVE ROAD' <br /> To reschedule the public hearing date to receive public on the closure of a portion o p blip <br /> 18, 1986e <br /> p of cedar rove Road to February <br /> i <br />