Minutes - 19850528 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

000094 mini-warehouses and a convenience store have come into being since Chandler Concrete Plant was put into effect. Harry Harkins, attorney representing Dr. Sally Feather and Ms. Betsy Rhine, spoke in opposition stating that his clients felt that this request went to the very essence of why Orange County needs the Land Use Plan. It would destroy the buffer zone between the concrete plant and the residential area. Harkins noted that Chandler did not acquire this land from the Rhine heirs. The property was sold to a real estate agent who later sold it to Chandler Concrete. The Rhine heirs would never have sold this property for commercial use. Laura Feather, daughter of Dr. Sally Feather, then read a letter (A copy of the descriptive narrative is in the permanent agenda file in the office of the Clerk to the Board) from Dr. Sally Feather in opposition of the amendment to the LUP. Ms. Feather continued, speaking in her own behalf. She felt the concrete company had shown a lack of regard for the well-being of the residents in the area. She continued that she felt it had been misused as an industrial waste disposal site and that it did jeopardize comfort, health and safety of the neighbors. She also expressed concerns with traffic safety given the number and size of vehicles and the narrow road. The concern for screening and buffer area was again expressed. Betsy Rhine, whose home is directly across the road from Chandler Concrete Co., then spoke. She stated that from her driveway she could view the entire project. She noted the lack of trees and stated that this helped to magnify the noise from the project. She stated that last summer the property was divided among the heirs and her brother went to Apple Creek Realty to talk to Mr. James Rae Freeland about the possibility of selling his property and Mr. Freeland assured him that the zoning would remain Residential-1. Her brother, with this reassurance, sold the land to James Freeland in late August of 1984. In early March 1985, she noted the property was completely cleared and stripped of all vegetation and it was evident that Chandler Concrete was expanding its operation. Ms. Rhine noted that she then contacted the Planning Department. She indicated it was two weeks before work was stopped on the site. She continued that the applicant had continued to use the land for cleaning the concrete trucks and emptying out into the pits. A petition was circulated among residents and she noted that almost everyone had complaints. She cited a letter from Ada Nichols expressing concern over the destruction of her driveway by the trucks. Gordon reminded citizens at this point, that this was only a request for a LUP amendment. If the amendment was implemented, then a request for rezoning would come forth. A real estate appraiser from Chapel Hill, P. H. Craig, was retained by the Rhines and he presented the following findings: He referenced maps regarding potential homesites and noted that they would look straight across to the pits and the lake precludes effective screening; all topsoil has been stripped and pits are easily visible. All frontages on SR 1710 will be adversly effected by the use or rezoning. He felt the whole 46 acres would suffer about $30,000 damage. M. C. Allison, a resident in Strayhorn Hills since 1978, spoke for residents of his immediate neighborhood. He noted damage done to vehicles due to rocks being thrown by concrete trucks. There were places where the cement had been emptied on the side of the road. Willard Cates, resident of Byrdsville for 12 years, expressed concern with traffic problems, debris and concrete spillage on sides of the road and near stop sign.