Minutes - 19850528 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

000001 Erosion Control Division to clear and grade new site. In con- junction with clearing and grading site, two retention ponds were constructed. Chandler planned to recycle water from lower pond back through concrete plant by use of pumps. This was an option suggested by DEM but Chandler did not obtain required state permits. 2-14-85 MTC site plan approval was issued by the Planning Department in conjunction with grading and clearing activities permitted by Sedimentation and Erosion Control Division. 3-25-85 A citizen's complaint was received by the Orange County Planning Department concerning Chandler's use of new tract for washing and parking concrete trucks. 4-9-85 Chandler officials met with the Planning Department and were advised that their use of the new tract was non-conforming since the use was an extension of their existing I-3 operation and the new site was zoned R-1. Washing and parking trucks and run-off retention were both non-conforming uses. They were advised to apply for a Land Use Plan amendment and, if successful, rezoning. They were warned against further use of the property until it was brought into compliance with zoning ordinance. 4-17-85 Application for amendment of Land Use Plan received from Chandler. 5-8-85 Chandler Concrete was notified by attorney for Dr. Sally Feather and Ms. Betsy Rhine of pending legal action if non-conforming uses not terminated. 5-16-85 Complaint filed with Orange County Planning Department by attorney for Dr. Sally Feather and Ms. Betsy Rhine. 5-17-85 Chandler barricaded new driveway connecting site to Old NC 10 and ceased non-conforming use of property. 5-20-85 Planning Department met with DEM to discuss project history, options, enforcement action, etc., and to conduct site visit. 5-20-85 Chandler was formally notified by the Orange County Planning Department that all non-conforming uses of the 4.34 acre tract must cease immediately until such time as properly zoned. * This reflects main events and does not include all correspondence or tele- phone calls regarding Chandler Concrete, State Agencies and opponents to the rezoning request. Bell stated that as of May 209 1985 DEM still had not received necessary application materials from Chandler. DEM also noted that they had not advised Chandler to go off site with the retention facilities; in fact, they had suggested they use the western portion of their tract which was being used to store concrete barricades at the time.