Orange County NC Website
.7 <br /> 00005 <br /> (21) The development shall be built and operated according to the <br /> site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in <br /> compliance with the above conditions. <br /> Commissioner Marshall asked if the Planning Board addressed the traffic <br /> problems and the devaluation of adjoining property values. Susan Smith <br /> indicated there were no points of discussion. DOT had indicated the traffic <br /> count in that area is not sufficient to be a concern. <br /> WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Lloyd to find the same positive findings as found by the Planning Board. <br /> VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall) . <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Lloyd to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board and the stipulations <br /> attached to the approval. <br /> VOTE: AYES. 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall) . <br /> 9. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS (see descriptive narrative <br /> on pages MWMf these minutes) . <br /> Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval two proposed <br /> Zoning Ordinance text amendments that were submitted to public hearing on May <br /> 28, 1985. This item was continued to receive the Planning Board's recommen- <br /> dation. The first amendment deals with the establishment and the permitted use <br /> table for Nonprofit Educational Cooperatives- as a Class A Special Use Permit <br /> permitted in the A-R zoning district. It would also add to Article eight a <br /> list of the specific requirements that a nonprofit association must submit and <br /> also add to Article 22 Definitions the definition of a Nonprofit Educational <br /> Cooperative-. The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amend- <br /> ments to Articles IV. VIII, and XXII. <br /> The second amendment had to do with a provision to Article 11 regard- <br /> ing non-conforming mobile homes which would permit individual mobile homes <br /> which are not located within a mobile home park to be replaced with other <br /> individual mobile homes or dwelling units. The Planning Board recommended <br /> denial of this proposed amendment because of the wording -or- dwelling units. <br /> The Planning Board does not want mobile homes replaced with stick-built homes. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Chair Willhoit to <br /> approve the Planning Staff's recommendation to approve the amendments as pre- <br /> sented to public hearing. <br /> Carl Walters, representative of the Planning Board, indicated that <br /> the reason for the Planning Board denial is that usually a stick built home is <br /> much larger than a mobile home which makes the lot nonconforming because of lot <br /> size and setbacks. <br /> VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall) . <br /> Chair Willhoit questioned Article 8.8.4.2.8 which reads -No chemical, <br /> toxic or hazardous substances are used, produced, stored or consumed on-site, <br /> and noted that this section should make specific references and be defined. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Lloyd that item -G- of Article 8.8.4.2 standard of evaluation be defined and <br /> brought back for adoption at a later date. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 10_ REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING-PRE, INC. <br /> Susan Smith presented for consideration a request from PHE, INC. to <br /> schedule a special public hearing on August 5. 1985 to hear a rezoning request <br /> to allow for expansion of the established Adam and Eve operation. <br />