Browse
Search
Minutes - 19851125
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Minutes - 19851125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 9:25:52 AM
Creation date
12/2/2013 9:25:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/25/1995
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
000007 <br /> retail trader sales and rental of convenience goods, <br /> merchandise and equipment (few customerst low traffic volumeâ–º <br /> no outside storage and no adverse impacts beyond space occupied <br /> by the building) <br /> Smith indicated that the rezoning of a 4.54 acre tract as proposed <br /> would provide for the expansion of the existing facility or development of <br /> other principle uses on individual lots. Both would require that the <br /> applicant would comply with many of the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance <br /> including land use intensity system which sets out maximum amounts of floor <br /> area open space, pedestrian space and other types of services. Also it <br /> requires that the site be landscaped and provide parking. The Planning Staff <br /> recommends approval of the request. <br /> COMMTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD <br /> Planning Board member Steve Kizer stated the reason there is not more <br /> property zoned LC-1 in this activity node is because the parcel containing the <br /> corporation's building is already illegally zoned GC-4. This happened five <br /> (5) years ago when the County zoned the property. He reiterated that LC-1 <br /> provides for a commercial use that is designed to serve a population in a <br /> rural neighborhood with convenience goods and personal services. The intent <br /> of this designation was to provide for the local convenience store which P & S <br /> Sporting Goods is not. It does not serve the local population, but is a <br /> national company. Alsoj, the traffic count is estimated to be more than that <br /> permissible in an LC-1. He asked that the Planning Staff reconsider their <br /> recommendation of approval because the proposal does not fall within the LC-1 <br /> designation in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> COMNIE'NTS OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS IN THE AUDIENCE <br /> Cheryl Atwater voiced opposition to the rezoning request. She noted she <br /> is against the products that are sold at Adam and Eve and asked that the <br /> County Commissioners review the literature on these products. She asked that <br /> those in the audience against the rezoning to stand and twenty people <br /> responded. <br /> Mr. R. D. Emerson spoke in opposition of the rezoning request. He <br /> compared the present Adam and Eve facility to a waste treatment plant. This <br /> rezoning in no way would better the community. He would be shocked to receive <br /> a catalog and sees no way the products sold could better his family. <br /> Dan Eddleman addressed the intent of the LC-1 district and read the <br /> location criteria as stated in the Zoning Ordinance which indicates the user <br /> serve a market area population of the immediate area and generally would not <br /> serve commuters or persons outside the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed <br /> use of P & S Sporting Goods is not in keeping with the intent or the spirit of <br /> the local businesses in an LC-1 district. Their ads appear in national <br /> magazines. By approving this rezoning the County would be setting a precedent <br /> in approving this business as a complying use in LC-1 district. He asked that <br /> the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners assure compliance with the <br /> Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Jeanette Jones pointed out that P & S Sporting Goods is an existing <br /> business which is requesting a rezoning to expand that business. They do hire <br /> employees from this area and the building is attractive and landscaped. There <br /> is not at present a traffic problem and this rezoning would not have an <br /> impact. She spoke in support of the expansion which would bring in more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.