Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-1996 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 06-03-1996
>
Agenda - 06-03-1996 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2013 9:56:50 AM
Creation date
11/26/2013 9:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
Document Relationships
RES-1996-022 Resolution approving North Hill Subdivision Preliminary Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�U a 18 <br /> 3h0/9& PLdaUIWC� �OQRD NI�tIUTES <br /> Barrows noted that there were already subdivision roads accessing Whitfield Road <br /> She expressed concern that another is being added and none will line up with <br /> existing roads. Cameron responded that the location of this subdivision road was <br /> chosen because of the steep hill and curve. She also noted that it has been approved <br /> by NCDOT. Hoecke also responded that site distance at this location is much better. <br /> Brown asked which lots have septic easements. Cameron responded lots 2,3, 18& <br /> 19. <br /> Brooks asked if the systems are all to be conventional systems. Mr. David Morris, <br /> one of the developers, responded that they are to be conventional systems. Brooks <br /> also asked about the number of bedrooms and the response was five. <br /> Brown asked about the expected buildout time and the response was two years. She <br /> also asked about price range and the response was$500,000.00. <br /> MOTION: Hoecke moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by <br /> Allison. <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 3 opposed(Barrows-concerned with off-site septic easments and the entryway, <br /> Brooks-disappointed that more effort was not made toward affordable <br /> housing,Rosemond-also concerned with off-site septic systems). <br /> AGENDA ITEM#9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING 2/26/96 <br /> a. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> (1) Article 8.2 Special Uses <br /> Presentation by Mary Willis. <br /> This item is to consider a proposed amendment to Special Use provisions related to <br /> expiration,validity,and approval actions for Special Use Permits. <br /> In a letter dated December 18, 1995,the County Attorney recommended several <br /> changes to the Zoning Ordinance provisions pertaining to Special Uses. <br /> It is proposed that the following standard requirements be explicitly stated in each <br /> Special Use Permit. <br /> that the permit will become null and void if any of the conditions are <br /> held invalid or void;and <br /> that the permit will automatically expire within 12 months of <br /> approval if the use has not commenced or if construction has not <br /> commenced and proceeded,unless a time extension is approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.