Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-17-1996 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 12-17-1996
>
Agenda - 12-17-1996 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2013 3:19:04 PM
Creation date
11/19/2013 3:19:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/17/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961217
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> Even if the two Boards of Commissioners were to agree that the USGS line is a logical basis for trying to <br /> resolve the location of the County line, much work would remain to be done with citizens whose residency <br /> would be affected by recognition of the USGS line as the official county boundary. Land Records/GIS staff <br /> have identified 242 parcels of land north to south between the Caswell and Chatham County lines that would be <br /> affected by recognizing the USGS line as the boundary instead of the traditional line shown on County property <br /> tax maps (where part or all of a parcel falls between the green and blue lines on the accompanying set of 3 <br /> maps). Some citizens who have always been considered Orange County residents, who have paid taxes to and <br /> received services from Orange County, would find themselves on the Alamance County side of the newly <br /> recognized County boundary. <br /> We encountered a similar issue, although on a much smaller scale, when Orange County resolved the location of <br /> the Orange-Chatham line in the late 1980s. We dealt with that by creating an agreement between the Orange <br /> and Chatham Boards of Commissioners that allowed citizens, "where permitted by law", to continue to receive <br /> services from and pay taxes to one county or the other if their residency was affected by the official relocation <br /> of the county line. We could pursue similar arrangements with residents affected by a"relocated" Orange- <br /> Alamance County line. However, the Orange and Alamance County Boards of Education would need to be <br /> involved in any decisions relating to which school system students from the other county would attend. Also, <br /> any agreement that Orange County might enter into with Alamance would deal with traditional services like <br /> police, fire, EMS, planning, code enforcement, and the like - it would not address the question of residency for <br /> the purposes of voting or standing for elected office. <br /> This memo is an attempt to provide you with a concise update on a complex matter, so I expect that there are a <br /> number of questions you may have which I have not addressed. Accordingly, I suggest that staff plan to present <br /> a report on this subject at an upcoming regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners. In that way, staff and <br /> the attorney can respond to your questions and receive your direction as to how to proceed on this matter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.