Orange County NC Website
SEP-13-19% 16:eO SOCC/r R <br /> DRAFT 4 14 <br /> 1 Temporary events such as those described above would not be considered a principal use when they take place <br /> 2 at a site normally associated with the activity. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 COMMENTS ANngR QUESTIONS FROM TH @OARD OF COMMISSIONERS. <br /> 5 ' <br /> 6 Commissioner Gordon asked which residential districts were included in this request <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Mary Willis indicated that all districts up to R-13. She indicated that this was being proposed for a <br /> 9 Special Use Permit so that issues such as parking availability could be looked at for each request Also,there <br /> 10 would be a Public Hearing required for each request <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 cOMMENTB AND/OR QUE3'RONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD - None <br /> 14 <br /> 1S,- COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS F&QM QMZENS <br /> 16 <br /> IT Paul Tripodi,an Orange County resident,stated that he was applying for permission to hold small <br /> 1$ outdoor events,such as wedding receptions. He was not interested in any of the larger scale events mentioned <br /> 19 in the presentation. They would never have events that lasted several days or evening events which would <br /> 20 require outdoor fighting. He has been working with the State and County Health Departments to determine what <br /> 21 needs to be done to meet health requirements and water availability. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Commissioner Gordon commented that although there does not appear to be off-site impact at this <br /> 24 particular location,that might not be true of other applicants. At Issue here is the essence of a residential area <br /> 25 and whether or not this would generally be an appropriate residential enterprise. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Mary VVlilis commented that this was not considered a"home occupation because it would have an <br /> 28 impact greater than that expected from a home business, For that reason,staff developed the'Temporary <br /> 29 Events'category. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Ann Peterson,a friend of the Tripodi's,asked that the Board grant the Tripodi s request She mentioned <br /> 32 that the Temporary Event category is much broader than that which was requested. The Tripods main concern <br /> 33 is the inconvenience and time problems associated with having to apply for a Special Use Permit for each of <br /> 34 these events. <br /> 36 Jim Glover,also a friend of The'Tdpodrs,asked the Board of County Commissioners to approve their <br /> 37 request to hold small catered weddings on their rural property. Most of the allowed activities in this'temporary <br /> 3$ Event'category are much larger than anything that the Tnpodi's would ever schedule. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Patti Tripodi mentioned that there are several horse farms,a dairy farm and a brick mason in the <br /> 41 immediate vicinity. She felt dual their area was actually more cornmerclal than residential. She asked that the <br /> 42 Board of County Commissioners approve their request <br /> 44 Commissioner Gordon fait that it was very important to pay <br /> close attention to anything that would create <br /> 45 a non-residential irnpa d in a residential community. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Commbsioner VMwa aWWd true County Attorney if it would be possible to find this type of event by the <br /> 48 number of acres invdved. For example,3 people could be allowed for each acre. <br /> 49 haw ny people <br /> 50 Geoff Gkdttrl�KPH that he would research the legality of this way of determining ma <br /> 51 would to allowed. <br /> 52 <br /> 53 A motion was made by Commissioner W i hoit,seconded by Commissioner Crovvttiec,b refer the <br /> 54 proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br /> 55 Commissio ms no sooner than October 1,1996. The Planning Board is also requested fA how they <br /> 58 would deal with otf3ft imps such as density.number of vehicles and setbacks,. <br /> 57 VOTE UNANIMOUS <br /> x <br />