Agenda - 12-17-1996 - 9b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8/26/96 Public Hearing Minutes DRAFT 13 1 2 Dean Lategan,a resident of Stage Coach Run,spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment change 3 as they would effect Lots 1,2,4 and 5 in Section A and Lot 1 in Section B. He stated that those lots are actually 4 a part of Stage Coach Run. He did not believe that Mr. Davis has the right to exclude any lots from the 5 subdivision without permission from the Homeowners Association. The Association is willing to take this matter 6 to court if necessary. They are opposed to rezoning the lots which were originally a part of Stage Coach Run. 7 They do not have an opinion on the other lots. 8 ' 9 Geof Gledhill mentioned that if the lots are a part of the subdivision,the restrictions apply unless 10 changed by the Homeowners Association. 11 12 Arthur Cogswell, the project planner,stated that the density of development for these lots is not an issue 13 for them. They have not formulated plan at this time,however,they intend to work with the community. They 14 will be in communication when they do develop a plan. 15 16 Mr.Charles Davis stated that the lots in question were originally sold to Center Point and were 17 reclaimed by him when Center Point went bankrupt. He did not want to take them back but did not have a 18 choice. The lots were eliminated from Center Points plan in the 1980s. The CHunty Tax Maps do not show 19 these lots as a part of Stage Coach Run. He also mentioned that the lots are no subdivided and are,in fact, 20 one tract 21 22 Mary Willis stated that there was originally an area that extended to where those lots were platted. 23 However,a large area was recombined and put back into one tract 24 25 A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther,seconded by Commissioner VAhoik to refer this item 26 to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Baud of Commissioners no sooner than 27 October 1,19%. 28 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 29 30 2. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments 31 (a) Efland Setback Overlay District 32 1)Article 4.2.26 District Statements of Intent and Application Criteria 33 2)Article 624 Efland Setback Overlay District 34 This item was presented by Mary Willis to consider the creation of a new 35 Overlay Zoning District which would allow lesser setbacks than generally required in the underlying zoning 36 district,and to apply the new Overlay district to Ten and Twenty-Year Transition Areas in the Efland Area. 37 These proposed overlays would allow setbacks of 20 feet from road right-of-way and 8 feet tom side and rear 38 property lines.with provisions for zero-Iodine development in the interior of a subdivision. The proposed 39 settmits are comparable to the setbacks curtently allowed in the R-5 zoning districts. 40 This item was presented along with Item 1.3. 41 The motion was made in item La above as restated below. 42 43 An iolia was made by Commissioner Gordon,seconded by Commissioner Crowther,to refer this stem 44 to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Comm isaioner5 no sooner than 45 October 1.19W 46 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 47 48 (b) Temporary Events 49 1)Ankle 8.8.14 Special Uses(Temporary Events) 50 2)Article 6.15.17 Additional Requirements for Certain Permitted Uses 51 3)Article 4.2 Permitted Use Table 52 4)Article 22 Article 22 Defnitions 53 TINS item was presented by Mary VVnas to consider a citizen request to create a 54 new use category called"Temporary Events'which would be allowed In residential districts with approval of a 55 Special Use Permit Examples of this kind of use are commercial Craft shows.caniivals,festivals,concerts, 56 medical or veterinary dk*=,and outdoor social events hosted by a business such as a restaurant or caterer.