Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-2013 - 5c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-19-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-19-2013 - 5c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 11:26:47 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 12:29:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-19-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
RES-2013-096 Resolution Approving Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Access Management Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
57 <br /> Attachment 5 <br /> Tony Blake: When we did the rezoning last year, I took a drive up there and I heard at <br /> least 4 or 5 people comment that the biggest transportation improvement needed is to <br /> fix the railroad bridge on Old NC 10 because the trucks keep going down there and <br /> slamming that bridge overpasses or having to back up when they realize the bridge is <br /> too low. Did that figure into this plan? Are you working with DOT on that? <br /> Abigaile Pittman: We reviewed that in the course of this access management plan <br /> because we heard comments from the residents out there that they don't want the truck <br /> traffic going down NC 10 and into Hillsborough. Our review is that it is not possible <br /> because of the bridge. They don't have adequate clearance. I think what could be <br /> done is that we need some good signage and good communication from NCDOT <br /> because truckers have to clear their routes and it needs to be properly signed that they <br /> can't get down that road. We can certainly recommend communication with NCDOT to <br /> create a good system of signage through there. <br /> Maxecine Mitchell: People are concerned about the vehicle traffic and speed. To not <br /> encourage more traffic on Old NC 10. Whatever development that comes will create <br /> more traffic on Old NC 10and it will be very dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists <br /> who utilize that road as a scenic route. <br /> Abigaile Pittman: One of the objectives of an Access Management Plan is to control <br /> that traffic flow and manage the access points so the road has capacity to manage it in <br /> a safe manner. <br /> Maxecine Mitchell: If we have it in here, we will have to educate the community on how <br /> we plan to redirect the traffic. <br /> Craig Benedict: If you don't have an access management plan on Highway 70 where <br /> the focus of the growth is, the higher intensity area where things are planned, then <br /> people are going to look for a bypass. The main purpose of this is to designate <br /> efficiently spaced intersections on 70 with frontage roads so that people are directed to <br /> these potential of a signalized intersection to handle the growth and then they won't look <br /> for these bypasses as much. It really is a benefit to the peripheral areas to bring people <br /> to those services that may be eventually on 70. <br /> Lisa Stuckey: Could you repeat what you said about the bike lanes? <br /> Abigaile Pittman: NCDOT striped two feet from the edge of the curb to allow for the <br /> bicyclists. <br /> Paul Guthrie: Most of the signatures on the petition is concentrated in that area of the <br /> subdivision so I would suggest that further communication with them regarding the <br /> access management plan, the transportation planning, may ease their pain. <br /> Pete Hallenbeck: One of the things we can see from the petitioners' map and <br /> addresses is that there is confusion over the difference between zoning and an access <br /> management plan. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.