Agenda - 11-19-2013 - 5c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

54 Attachment 4 David Walbert said he signed the petition with full knowledge that it was not about the issue before the Board tonight. He said there was no petition to be signed 5 years ago. He said he found out about the plan in 2008 with only 2 days notice. He spoke at that meeting. He said that Chair Jacobs made the same comment at that meeting regarding a map that was drawn in 1980. He said it seems at every point in this process the Board is referring back to something that already happened. He said he would ask that the Planning Board and the Commissioners take into account the concerns expressed in that petition regarding the character and the fact that there is a residential neighborhood involved. Commissioner Price said the petition is about something else, but he management plan does affect the residents' way of life and quality of life. A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to: 1. Refer the matter to the OUTBoard and the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned in time for the 11-19-2013 BOCC meeting. 2. Direct staff to review the standards applied to the Saint Mary's Road scenic corridor to see if and how these standards may be applied to Old Highway 10. 3. Adjourn the public hearing until 11-19-2013 in order to receive and accept the OUTBoard's and Planning Board's recommendations, and any submitted comments. Commissioner Dorosin asked for clarification on what is supposed to come back to the Board with regard to the Access Management Plan. He said there is not really a plan yet. Abigaile Pittman said this is a plan that offers criteria and a map Commissioner Dorosin said the abstract says this says it is a draft plan Abigail Pittman said this draft plan offers criteria and a map on future access and connectivity through the EDD. She said the highlights review existing conditions and how staff arrived here today. She said this is not a plan that examines any one development proposal, but it is a policy guideline with criteria to guide future development actions. Commissioner Dorosin said he feels that he needs a more specific plan of what this means. He said this is only a criticism of his own lack of understanding. He referred to the signal intersections map. He said a plan, to him, states a list of what will be done. He asked what the Board would be approving when this comes back in two months. Tom Altieri said what will be coming back will be the entire plan. He said this is pages 6 — 38 of the agenda packet. He said the map that Commissioner Dorosin refers to is within that plan. He said this could also be referred to as an access management plan for the area. He said this map is really a conceptual plan that provides the County the opportunity for future development. He said this will give the County future opportunity to get signals added, and to require easements for service roads to maintain the integrity of the existing roadway. Commissioner Dorosin said he is still not satisfied that there are enough details.