Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-02-1996 - 15a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 12-02-1996
>
Agenda - 12-02-1996 - 15a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2013 10:44:08 AM
Creation date
11/14/2013 10:44:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/2/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
15a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961202
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> 10 <br /> same time, however,most wastewater systems are not designed to provide ground water <br /> recharge,and a significant portion of wastewater return may be lost to evapo-transpiration. <br /> • Additional adjustments for changes in infiltration capacity of the land may increase the <br /> needed recharge area.For example,conversion of land from permanent seldom-grazed <br /> pasture or woodland to maintained lawns may reduce infiltration capacity by 50-60%and <br /> require a subsequent increase in recharge area. <br /> The above issues are subject to challenge and interpretation. Further research and study will <br /> be required on these issues before the approach outlined in this example could be put into use. <br /> Findings that ground water demand is lower than assumed(lower per capita use rates, lower <br /> person/dwelling rates, inclusion of wastewater return)could result in an average recharge <br /> area that is smaller than that shown in the example. On the other hand,conservative <br /> estimation of ground water demand and use can produce a more reliable water supply and <br /> help preserve stream base flow rates <br /> The second example assumes that there is site-specific data available for a proposed community <br /> water system.Here,test wells have been drilled and recharge duration statistics are used to <br /> estimate the amount of land needed for recharge of the community wells. <br /> Further research will be needed in this area to determine the implications for developments <br /> that utilize community wells.. <br /> Again, it should be noted that conditions on a particular tract may not be typical of an entire <br /> basin, so these examples should be considered as part of a basin-wide analysis only. <br /> Next <br /> As phase one of the Water Resources Committee's ground water resource investigation,this <br /> report provides new information about the rate of recharge to ground water in Orange County. <br /> The examples shown illustrate ways that ground water data may be used for management of the <br /> resource.However,this study is only an overview of average recharge rates in 12 basins.Use of <br /> these approaches will require additional information not currently known about the County's <br /> ground water resources. <br /> To further the knowledge of ground water resources,the Water Resources Committee will be <br /> proposing a scope of work to take the next step toward investigating the availability of ground <br /> water.Although a site-specific level of data about ground water availability will not be cost- <br /> effective,the second phase of the ground water investigation will work toward the creation of a <br /> "contour map"of ground water availability by analysis of test wells and other hydrogeologic <br /> research.This phase of the study will be presented to the Board of Commissioners at the <br /> December 7, 1996 Goal-Setting Retreat. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.