Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-04-1996 - 9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 11-04-1996
>
Agenda - 11-04-1996 - 9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2013 8:45:12 AM
Creation date
11/12/2013 8:45:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/4/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961104
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
RES-1996-051 Resolution approving the University Manor Phase II Preliminary Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> 38 <br /> DRAFT <br /> Price asked about the load from the septic for such a large subdivision on the <br /> groundwater supply. Stancil responded that each site would be evaluated by the <br /> Environmental Health Department. Price expressed concern with the density. It <br /> was noted that there are 281 units over 595 acres. Stancil continued that the <br /> work with the Water Resources Committee has found that there are not a lot of <br /> water quality problems in Orange County. Mr.Mitchell noted that two wells <br /> have been drilled which yield 60 and 35 gallons per minute. This is twice the <br /> yield required by the State. <br /> Strayhorn asked the depth of the wells and the response was 300-500 feet. <br /> Brown asked about holding tanks. Mr.Mitchell responded that there will be a <br /> 10,000 gallon holding tank in the first phase. Brown asked if Mitchell had the <br /> complete water plan for the entire project and the response was no but it would <br /> not take a great deal to develop the entire plan. The wells will be scattered and <br /> inter-connected. There should be the ability to tap on to a public supply. <br /> MOTION: Brooks moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by <br /> Hoecke. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor. <br /> 3 opposed(Brown-specifically wants a complete understanding of the utilities <br /> in the project and to have impact statement updated and accurate in terms of its <br /> traffic and school projection figures. Katz-concerned with impact analysis.On <br /> projects of this scale we need to be working with a longer term. Price- <br /> concurred with both Brown and Katz.) <br /> AGENDA ITEM#9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING 8/26/96 <br /> a. Zoning Atlas Amendments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.