Agenda - 11-04-1996 - 8k - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

OCT-28-1996 09:39 FROM ORANGE CTY PUBLIC WKS TO 3004 ' �ui[sraD memorandum 5 • expenditure andfor program reductions, • a owthiatfon of the above. - �ndiq Asar=—daslar7atad and undswa fflOd As of June 30, 1996,the LandtDI Fund had andesignated reserves of$469,929. The landfii's budget for operations in 199&97 is$3,806.WO. Undesignated fund balance is about 12.3%of the owational budget We have typically bed to maintain around 10% undesignated hAW balance. In addition, designated reserve funds khckude the fallowing: • Fukm Land Acquisitions and Construction Reserve $ 652,500 • Eubanks Construction Reserve $1,068,500 • Equipment Reserve $ 121,900 The reserve for Eubanks Corrstruc ion will be needed in fiscal year 1997-96 for mmuction of the ne)d phase of the la WM. The equipment reserve is necessary for ongoing repiacemerd of lWWQ heavy madwmy. The loge land acquisitions and won reserve may be necessary to take advantage of oppwtun"to purchase land. to 1995-96,the landfill was able to purchase time tracts of land sooent to the cement landfill using no reserve. Please we the attached sheet for a detailed bresi down of landfill fund aWky. Iha*-Ma FNCt ' Cwtent IW*year 1996.97 tipping fees and wed tonnages are as bWws: M Tip Fee Est Tars Esbi rimW l4ievenr�e Mbced Sold Waste $31.000ton 57,0W $1.787,000 Construction&Demolition $31.00/ton 33.000 $1,023,000 A December 1,1M,Upping fee increase of$8.80 would make up the enthe revenue deficit ass<mhing no reduction in tonnage due to price increase. However,we would anticipate a signtlicant decrease in non govern nentd waste, especially C&D, deWwW to the hnffA with such a drarndic Up fee increase. Gove"mumtal waste currently is only 48%of the waste show exCludkhg ash. Forconqw1w a purposes the Upping fees for neiphb t counties are as follows: S Miked Vito Fee Alarnhanoe County $30.87 X2.00 tQ$30.87(dWxxg g upon category) Chatham County $30.42 $30.42 Druharn County $39.50 $24.00 In addition!o these pudic Paco" there are several privately run fads for the disposal of irWW debris or nubble that is a subgakWy of rrhbasd construction and dernolitiorh material. The diversion d cool ash *OM the larr 1 WE not result in any SoriffieWit Cost savings in ka KNM opefatforhs. qowkwt w0anditure savklgs would require redructiorts in recydirg proW*m orr the elimi orlon of major projects. The t an=Owners Group has not apeowd an krtereal in reducing swma in order to make up the deficit; however, we discussed potential proMa n cuts. Vve hove r+eoonvnerhded program cuts totift $34.000. These khckrde e6nkm Pion of 1 ne"sletih r issue and the furhdirhg for the proposed food waste collection F roam for fiscal year 1996-97. TOTAL P.03