Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-15-1996 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 10-15-1996
>
Agenda - 10-15-1996 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2017 9:56:55 AM
Creation date
11/11/2013 12:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/15/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> t <br /> • The Board of Commissioners encouraged staff to see if funding for <br /> County projects could be "held harmless" without tapping the funds <br /> earmarked for a land capital reserve. <br /> Option 5B presented here, addresses each of these concerns as will be <br /> explained below. <br /> Option 5A as presented on September 17, included the following key elements: <br /> • All funding currently earmarked for capital projects would continue. <br /> Debt service (existing and planned) would be deducted before funds <br /> are allocated to the two School systems and to County capital projects. <br /> • The equivalent of three cents on the general fund property tax rate <br /> would be earmarked for recurring capital for the Schools. These funds <br /> would be allocated to each school system based on the State <br /> Department of Public Instruction planning allocation (projected student <br /> enrollment) which is prepared in April each year. <br /> • Orange County citizens would be asked to vote on a $40 million bond <br /> referendum in November 1997. This referendum would include $35 <br /> million for Schools with the balance used for County projects, and <br /> possibly housing and parks/recreation. <br /> The funding plan as presented here is based on the new facility needs as <br /> presented by the two school systems during the Capital Improvements Plan <br /> process last Spring. The cost for the new facilities was based on the School <br /> Construction Standards approved by the Board of Commissioners in May 1996, <br /> adjusted for five percent annual inflation until each project is bid. The School <br /> systems can decide to construct a school at less than the Level Two standards <br /> adopted, therefore freeing up funds for on-going capital projects. <br /> A fundamental element of the conceptual plan endorsed by the Commissioners <br /> is review of the capital needs identified, by a Commissioner appointed Capital <br /> Needs Advisory Committee. As the needs assessment process is conducted, the <br /> committee studying school and county capital needs may want to review the <br /> projects that have already been identified, to determine if other adjustments <br /> should be made in the capital funds distribution formula to ensure that the <br /> highest priority capital needs are being addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.