Agenda - 10-15-1996 - 8k - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT 23 1 Geoff Gledld mentioned that private rtsU ove coverwo do not rmmstrik t the County from 2 Howem.the residents do not have to allow ttte denser development in their cornniunityy. The originaalj 4 covenants can be a rib-cod reg by the Home Owners Association ardless of dm zoning. 5 Dean Latera%a resident of Stage Coact Run,spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment 0 char><{e as they would effect Lots 1.2.4 and 5 in Section A and Lot 1 in Section B. He sued that those tots 7 am acW*a pat of Stage Coach RwL He did not believe that Mr.Davis has the right to exdtkde any late 8 Aron the subxilvision without permission from the Homeowners Association. The Association is wiping b take 9 this manor to corer d necessary. They are opposed to rezoning the lots which were origiriaIIy a part of Stage 10 Coach Run. They do not have an opinion on the other lots. 11 12 Goof Glez A mentioned that if the lots are a part of the subdivision,time restrictions apply unless 13 changed by the Homeowners Association. 14 15 Arthur Cogswel,the project planner.stated that the density of development for these lots is not an 15 issue for them. They have not formulated plan at this time.however.they intend to work with the 17 community. They will be in c oninuniation when they do develop a plan. 18 19 Mr.Charin Davis stated that the lots in question were originally sold to Center Point and were 20 rocloin by him when Center Point went bankmpt. He did not wart to take them back but did not have a 21 choice. The kola were e1i rrinate4 Atom Center Points plan in the 1980s. The County Tax Maps do not show 22 these tots as a part of Stage Coach Run. He also mentioned that the lots am not subdivided and are.in fact 23 one tract 24 25 Mary Wigs staled that there was onginsiry an area that wdwWed to where those lots ware ph0-1. 26 Howawr,a 4rge area was reeornbined and put back into one trail 27 28 A motion was made by Come*siorw Crowther,sek>Dnded by Conn nbsiocw VV6hoit,to refer this 29 am b the Panning Board for a reoorrenindation to be returned to the ecard of Commisaionds no sooner 30 toad October 1.low 31 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 32 33 Z Zoning Ordinance Text Amendnants 34 (a) Etland Setback Overlay District 35 1)Article 4226 District Stamrrmnb of intern and Application Criteria 36 2)Atide 624 Etfarnd Selbardk Overlay Distrid 37 This item was presented by Mary VVIlk to co -older ttne aestfon of a new 38 Overlay Zoning Dbtrlct which woM allow laar setbacks khan generaly required in the urxlefi►irg zkming 39 drshi p and b apply the new Overtay district b Tan and TvmatyYear Tr&rdAW Areas in the Ellend Area. 40 These proposed overlsys would slaw a 1 tbaatcs of 20 feet from road rV t-f-way and 8 tbat ft mm side and 41 tar properly lines.with provisions for zero-Ioiina development in the interior of a subdivision. The proposed 42 setbacks arms comparable to the setbacks aurarily allowed In the R-6 zoning districts. 43 This item was pros or" ahorg with form 1.a. +tj4 The nhofbn was made in item La above as restated below. 45 a A moft n was made by C0ffffIiGskxw Gordon.seconded by Commissiorker Crowther,to refer this 47 item b the Plsnnrup Na n d Aare reCOnrnnendation to be returnned m true Boecd of Conrnissioners no sooner 48 than October 1,190 49 VOTE UWINDXM 50 it (h) Tnvqvamnr Events 1)Article d.8.14 Special Uses(Temporary Events) S3 2)Article 6.16.17 Additional Requirements tot Coercion Permitted Uses 54 3)ANcie 4.2 Forrojowl Use Table 53 4)Arti fe 22 Arms 22 DeMitlons 56 This horn was presennted by Macy VilNis to consider s citizrem regtrrat loci 57 crab a taw use==goy Baled'Temporary Events'which would be slow0 d in residential OWIM wlh