Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-12-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-12-2013 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 11-12-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2015 3:11:27 PM
Creation date
11/8/2013 2:15:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/12/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-12-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Informal Resident Advisory Work Group <br />Cedar Grove Community Center <br />August 27, 2013 <br />Page 4of5 <br />45 <br />• The plan depicts the existing gravel parking lot being paved and new sidewalks being added from the <br />parking lot to both the ceremonial entry facing Highway 86 and the new main entry adjacent to the Multi- <br />purpose room. <br />• It was stated that as the site plan was developed further, the area in front of the new main entry would be <br />refined to enhance the entry experience. <br />• It was noted that all entries to the building will be handicapped accessible. <br />• The Informal Advisory Group asked if the parking lot driveway could be relocated. The current driveway <br />location has been an area of concern for some time due to limited sight distance created by the inclined <br />approach on NC -86. The architect agreed to contact the local NCDOT engineer Chuck Edwards. <br />• The members of the Informal Advisory Group requested that there be adequate exterior lighting <br />provided not only for security, but also to enhance the experience at night for visitors to the facility. <br />• The members of the Informal Advisory Group requested that landscaping be adding on the Highway 86 <br />side of the project. County representatives stated that any landscaping would need to include drought <br />tolerant plantings and it was also noted that the location of these plantings would need to be coordinated <br />with the location of the existing septic tank and drain field. <br />• John Thomas stated that the location of the future cell tower was not known at this time but this <br />information has been requested. <br />• The members of the Informal Advisory Group stated that would like a site feature where the original <br />flagpole was located. <br />■ There was discussion and agreement among the Informal Advisory Group that a plaque and <br />gathering area should be located at the flagpole commemorating the "maypole" tradition that <br />had been a part of the school. <br />John Thomas reviewed the furniture layout plans of the Meeting Rooms and the Multi -media Room. <br />• The Architect explained the furniture for the center is not part of the contract, but furniture layouts need <br />to be discussed so that the required infrastructure can be coordinated. <br />• The Architect presented 3 different layouts for the meeting rooms showing how the space could be used <br />as three individual rooms or as 1 large room. The capacity for meetings can range from 90 to 176 people <br />depending upon the room configuration and style of seating. <br />• The members of the Informal Advisory Group agreed that the Meeting Rooms seemed to <br />function well as laid out and had a great deal of flexibility for different events. <br />• Storage cabinets should be added to the Recreation Room for the storage of games and other <br />items and to provide countertop space. <br />• The Architect presented 3 options for the furniture layout in the Multi -media Room. The consensus of <br />the Informal Advisory Group was that Option 3 was the preferred layout as it offered the most flexibility <br />within the space to support multiple simultaneous activities. <br />■ Sue Florence stated that she was very pleased with the flexibility offered by Option 3. <br />• There was discussion regarding the funding of computers and technology equipment for the project. <br />Architect reminded the group that Technology equipment is not part of the construction contract. The <br />Informal Advisory Group stated that someone will need to investigate possibility of obtaining grant <br />funds to pay for the technology equipment for the project. <br />• The Informal Advisory Group also discussed the need for a technical support person on site. The County <br />Representatives explained that an on -site person would not be likely but that a local server would be <br />provided and county technical support could be available to address issues. <br />■ The members of the Informal Advisory Group asked the County Representatives if it would be <br />possible for training to be provided for local volunteers so they could help with any minor issues <br />that may arise when the facility was being used. The County Representatives stated that they will <br />need to discuss this with the IT department. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.