Orange County NC Website
Informal Resident Advisory Work Group <br />Cedar Grove Community Center <br />July 30, 2013 <br />Page 3of5 <br />16 <br />The additional land purchased across Hwy 86 for a future septic field is not "contiguous" and <br />cannot be used to offset impervious surface requirements, but could be the site for a proposed <br />"park and ride" lot. <br />o It was asked if a police substation had been discussed as a possible use of the building. At this point it has <br />not been included. <br />John Thomas led a discussion of the programs and spaces envisioned for the facility. <br />• A program of spaces was distributed and reviewed. The program was developed discussions at the last <br />meeting and past community input sessions. The total space required to meet the programs desired is <br />greater than the 10,000 square feet available for renovation. <br />• Each of the program areas were reviewed in more detail. <br />■ The existing Cafeteria is approx 2,554 square feet in area which allows an occupancy of 171 <br />persons. <br />It was noted that the occupancy sign on the door stated that the room was only certified <br />for only 100 people. Lori stated that they will discuss this with the fire department to <br />see why they space was rated so low. <br />The existing gym space is not sized for basketball. A basketball court requires a minimum floor <br />area of 60' x 85' x 20' high and the existing space is only 43' wide x 78' long and only has 14' -8" <br />of clearance. <br />• The possibility of lifting the roof was suggested and the architect stated that they would <br />review this option. <br />• Basketball was noted as being very important to the community. It was also noted that <br />in the list of reservations from 2009 -2011 for the building shows the reservations for <br />basketball were 3 times greater than for any other program. <br />• John Thomas reviewed the option of turning the basketball court 90 degrees to create a <br />correctly sized half court gym. This option would also leave 800 square feet for other <br />uses. <br />o The group felt that a full size or as near to full size court as possible was a <br />priority for the project. <br />• It was stated that the basketball goals would need to have the ability to be raised and <br />lowered. <br />• In summary it was noted that maintaining a full size gym is a priority but there will need <br />to be trade -offs based on the budget constraints. <br />■ The need for the existing stage was reviewed. <br />• The majority of the group supported the need for a stage of some sort, either the <br />existing stage remaining or a portable stage being provided for flexibility. <br />• The architect stated that they were still investigating the construction of the existing <br />stage and this may limit the ability of the existing area to be removed within the budget. <br />• The possibility of adding a movable wall to the existing proscenium arch to the stage <br />was discussed. <br />• It was noted that if the stage was to remain it would need to be made ADA accessible <br />and this would require a large ramp to be added to the building or a wheelchair lift <br />added. <br />■ It was stated that the Parks and Recreation department would need an office in the new facility <br />for 1 full time staff position with room for 2 additional seasonal staff positions. A storage area <br />for small tools is also required. <br />