Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
20 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Attachment 8 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Excerpt of draft minutes <br /> 5 <br /> 6 DRAFT MINUTES <br /> 7 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 8 OCTOBER 2,2013 <br /> 9 REGULAR MEETING <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck(Chair),Cheeks Township Representative;Lisa Stuckey,Chapel Hill Township <br /> 13 Representative; Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham Township; Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; <br /> 14 Herman Staats, At-Large, Cedar Grove Township; James Lea, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Andrea <br /> 15 Rohrbacher,At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Paul Guthrie,At-Large Chapel Hill Township; <br /> 16 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 MEMBERS ABSENT: Johnny Randall, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township <br /> 19 Representative;Stephanie O'Rourke, Eno Township Representative;Vacant-Hillsborough Township Representative; <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Perdita Holtz, Special Projects Coordinator; Michael Harvey, <br /> 23 Current Planning Supervisor; Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor; Ashley Moncado, Special Projects <br /> 24 Planner;Abigaile Pittman,Transportation/Land Use Planner;Tina Love,Administrative Assistant II <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Agenda Item 7: Zoning Atlas Amendment—To make a recommendation to the BOCC on a property owner- <br /> 28 initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas to rezone a 2.67 parcel of property located at 3604 <br /> 29 Southern Drive(PIN 9844-86-5155)from Rural Residential (R-1) and Light Industrial (1-1)to <br /> 30 Light Industrial(1-1). This item was heard at the September 9,2013 quarterly public hearing. <br /> 31 Presenter: Michael Harvey,Current Planning Supervisor <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Michael Harvey: (Reviewed abstract). We have provided a synopsis of the questions asked at the public hearing.A <br /> 34 Commissioner wanted staff to clarify if this property was in an overlay zoning district specifically a watershed overlay <br /> 35 zoning district which it is, Upper Eno Protected,that means there is going to be impervious surface limits imposed on <br /> 36 any expansion of this property. There was also a question asked if the rezoning of this parcel would have an impact <br /> 37 on any property surrounding,and the answer is no. The only public comment I have received from the public hearing <br /> 38 is a call from Miss May who live right here(pointed out on location map),who expressed consternation that I made <br /> 39 Mr. Keizer go through this process at all. You have a planning staff recommendation of approval and the rationale for <br /> 40 our decision is the application was submitted in compliance with the UDO, the property is of sufficient size to be <br /> 41 rezoned as requested, and the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, the <br /> 42 Growth Management System Map, and the adopted Efland-Mebane Small Area Plan. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 MOTION made by Tony Blake to approve Attachments 2 and 3 to rezone the Keizer property a 2.67 acre parcel of <br /> 45 property located at 3604 Southern Drive. Seconded by Maxecine Mitchell. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 VOTE:Unanimous <br /> 48 <br /> 1 <br />