Browse
Search
Minutes 09-09-2013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Minutes 09-09-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2013 12:24:18 PM
Creation date
11/6/2013 12:20:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/9/2013
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - E1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
She said the current process also prevented these things from being loaded onto regular <br /> Board meeting agendas. She said you could hear an item at a separate hearing from the <br /> approval and this was important. It gives the public time to weigh in with the Planning Board <br /> and the Commissioners after the public hearing. <br /> She said she can see tweaks to the process, but she does not want to see the Planning <br /> Board cut out of making recommendations after the public has been heard. <br /> She thinks it is also important for the BOCC to approve notices. She said all of this <br /> policy is in the interest of transparency, and she supports the current process. She urged the <br /> Board not to change this process in any major way. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said she agrees with the need for a transparent process. She <br /> also thinks it is time to look at the quarterly public hearings because she is aware that there are <br /> things that are not working. She noted that there are often meetings with a delayed start due to <br /> lack of quorum. She noted that if the hearings were held at Commissioners' meeting, then <br /> Planning Board members would not have to be there, but could come if desired. She said the <br /> meetings would be recorded and available for Planning Board members to access. <br /> She said if a meeting is held and the Board does not vote on the same night, then that <br /> gives transparency. She said the recording process also makes it more transparent. <br /> She said she feels that if this change is made, it should not be just for Agriculture <br /> Support. She said she would like to have the Planning Board recommendation after the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he likes process 2. He said he does not like the current <br /> quarterly public hearing model. He said these items could come up in a meeting. He said <br /> anything that expedites the process is advantageous. <br /> He favors the Planning Board recommendation in advance of the public hearing. He <br /> feels this is a model that works. He said a Planning Board member can present at the public <br /> hearing and additional input can be asked for since the voting will not be the same night. <br /> He thinks the process can be streamlined and option 2 makes the most sense. <br /> Commissioner Price said her issue with number 2 is that the Planning Board does not <br /> get comments from the public before making a recommendation. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he views the Planning Board as the Board's experts and the <br /> public comments come to the Commissioners, and these comments don't need to be filtered by <br /> the Planning Board. <br /> Commissioner Rich noted that the Planning Board meetings are open to the public. She <br /> said that if the comments of the public don't mesh with the recommendations of the Planning <br /> Board the issue can always be referred back to them. <br /> She said she does not like the process of quarterly public hearings, and she does not <br /> think that it works. She does not know why these cannot be put into regular meetings. She <br /> feels that the process would be quicker. <br /> Commissioner Price said during her time on the board, there would be public hearings <br /> during Planning Board meetings. She said information went on the record, and then it was <br /> passed to the Commissioners. She said this created a back and forth process that prolonged <br /> things. She would like to see this fixed. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he would not support voting on an issue the same night the <br /> public hears about it; however he does agree that the process needs to be changed. <br /> He said he does not understand the justification of a legal ad having to come back to the <br /> Board for approval. He said the County has a very competent staff that is capable of putting out <br /> a legitimate ad without need of Board approval. <br /> He said there are some tweaks that can happen to move this process along further. He <br /> said there is the perception in the community that this process is used to slow down and <br /> obstruct the process. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he has heard the majority of the Board say that the process needs to <br /> be shortened. He said there are differences of opinion regarding the necessity of the quarterly <br /> hearings and whether these still function as designed. He said there is some sentiment is to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.